If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Yea gotta be Rowley and Buz. Been looking 4ward to that partnership 4 ages! or play legs and rowley sitting with buz just in front and 3 up top. HH, Vine and Routledge. Dangerous!
Yea gotta be Rowley and Buz. Been looking 4ward to that partnership 4 ages! or play legs and rowley sitting with buz just in front and 3 up top. HH, Vine and Routledge. Dangerous!
Just imagine QBPs reaction if EYR is right - one up front!!! To me, I think that with Buzz in the team, he needs a free role, just as Taarabt does, which means either three at the back (too radical for English teams apparently) OR one up top.
Away from home, I'd play Mahon in front of the back four with Rowly and Buzz in front of him. At home, I'd play Legs and Rowly with Buzz just in front of them.
The minute you say Buzzacky at CM you are talking a non 4-4-2 formation and therefore you forget it has been decreed that anything else is negative and not allowed. :devil:
For the record I'd have a 4-2-3-1 with Rowly + Legs holding Vine / Buzz / Routledge as the attacking midfielders and Dave or A N other upfront
Surely if we have a midfield pairing of Buzz and Rowly playing in a 442 then we will not be able to afford Buzz a free role as Rowly can not do the defensive side by himself, especially as neither of our wingers know how to get stuck in.
id have a 4-1-3-2 with rowly being the 1, then cook, buzz and routledge, dex n vine up front. would also play legs at RB. IF ARGIE PROVES TO BE GOOD THEN WOULD ROTATE
Surely if we have a midfield pairing of Buzz and Rowly playing in a 442 then we will not be able to afford Buzz a free role as Rowly can not do the defensive side by himself, especially as neither of our wingers know how to get stuck in.
Agreed,but a free role in a 433,451,or even 352 could pay dividends.The big question,IMO,is whether our players are good enough to switch formations as the game dictates.I doubt it,but if they improve enough,it could work.
Comment