Didn't Sullivan and Gold buy West Ham with about £100mil debt ?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Takeover stories could be true.
Collapse
X
-
This is not bull s11t. West ham were owned by one person so they could sell. The ownership is split at QPR even if Mittal only has 30% and Paladini 10%, the debt can not be transfered, its complicated but i am not a buisness lawyer so cant explain in the proper words.
Mittal cant veto a sale but he can have a big say on who comes in.
Gulf Air and Bernie have had a big tiff.
Comment
-
Originally posted by sw66 View PostThis is not bull s11t. West ham were owned by one person so they could sell. The ownership is split at QPR even if Mittal only has 30% and Paladini 10%, the debt can not be transfered, its complicated but i am not a buisness lawyer so cant explain in the proper words.
Mittal cant veto a sale but he can have a big say on who comes in.
Gulf Air and Bernie have had a big tiff.Top Scorers 2018/2019
Nakhi Wells - 8
Pawel Wszolek - 6
Luke Freeman - 6
Matt Smith - 6
Ebere Eze - 4
Joel Lynch - 3
Tomer Hemed - 3
Toni Leistner - 2
Massimo Luongo- 2
Angel Rangel - 2
Bright Osayi-Samuel - 2
Geoff Cameron - 1
Aramide Oteh - 1
Jake Bidwell - 1
Jordan Cousins - 1
Summer Transfers 2019
IN
OUT
Comment
-
My business law understanding = might be pre emptive rights to shares ie mittals get right to first offer if bernie/flab sell, though they may have waived this, though of course if they don't want to pay the price they can sell to outsiders, mittals don't get veto unless thy agreed that they did in the shareholders agreement, but will be influential if they don't want to sell their interests, as In potential new buyers may find it attractive to join the mittals,or they may be put off if they can't have the whole amount without the mittals, could go either way! Another thing is, mortals can't be obliged to sell their shares if thy don't want to! Probably just stated the obvious but meh also realise mittal is one bloke!
Comment
-
Originally posted by sw66 View PostJust hold on guys we are nearly there!
The reason no money has been spent is because Benie and tango cant sell the club with debt.18th August 2011. The day we got our Rangers back
Comment
-
Originally posted by Morris View PostSurely that is BS?
the reality is if we miss the transfer deadline we wont get sold as if we can be so adrift by xmas to late to invest and our value plummets right now is the highest price they will get so will need to be done BEFORE the deadline
Comment
-
Originally posted by sw66 View PostThis is not bull s11t. West ham were owned by one person so they could sell. The ownership is split at QPR even if Mittal only has 30% and Paladini 10%, the debt can not be transfered, its complicated but i am not a buisness lawyer so cant explain in the proper words.
Mittal cant veto a sale but he can have a big say on who comes in.
Gulf Air and Bernie have had a big tiff.
Comment
Comment