Warlocks transfer budget confirmed £1M down on plans

[Bernie's Barnet]

you need proof of that, why?

will it be the highlight of your life, you make it sound so important.

Simple really.

Pete's always denied it, but if he is in Paladini's pocket, then clearly this board was set up with the express intention of peddling Paladini's interests rather than those of the fans it is supposed to represent.

I'd say that's fairly important. Surely you can see that?

[Quaz]

Simple really.

Pete's always denied it, but if he is in Paladini's pocket, then clearly this board was set up with the express intention of peddling Paladini's interests rather than those of the fans it is supposed to represent.

I'd say that's fairly important. Surely you can see that?

imprortant to only a few by the sounds of it, myself and i would imagine a fair few others come here to converse with fellow r's.Only a few want to make it into the compare-the-penis.com

Still each to their own, i know what is important in my life, and it isn't ridiculing others.

[DeepcutHoop]

not saying it couldn't have been avoided at all, all i am saying it's the same sh!t carried over from other seasons, nothing has changed, all the people voicing their opinions in a big way on here, try voicing them to the club instead.
Whether pete is or isn't a puppet is irrelivent as he has no clout or say at the club.
So don't honeslty see the point of all the in fighting, just my view of things.

Pete is mates with Paladini, I understand why he feels some loyalty towards him, I really do.

I'm not really angry with Pete per se, but he is pretty much a lone voice in defending his incompetence, and as such has become a focus for the frustration. I'm angry with Paladini, and I'm angry with the club.

What he has done would have resulted in a dismissal in most businesses. Why not at our club?

[twranger]

Where exactly is it confirmed that the transfer budget is reduced by 1m? dont think it is confirmed anywhere, but happy to be corrected. all the offy confirms is that the fine will not be contested! this appears someone(op) putting 2 and 2 together and coming up with something which suits their particular agenda.
while all this faulin stuff was going on and points deduction being threatened, most said they'd be happy with a fine rather than points. now the fine has happened and confirmed as being not contested people are are now going ape and splitting hairs over the cost per st holder, as if it actually works like that! Unbelievable really!! Moving the posts in order to take a negative stance.

[bobby]

nothing wrong with a little bit of `dodgy`
it`s in the QPR DNA
most succesful periods in our history involved a bit of wideboy flair
jim gregory and rodney marsh-i was there
flying by the seat of our pants
john bloom (washing machines)
stan bowles
terry venables
now a real maverick in adel
bernie flavio gp- yeh well dodgy
mittals probably even dodgier
so what?
this is a golden time
this is west london
if i was asked to cough up 200 quid more on my season ticket at the start of the season
in exchange for maybe tucking up a few premiership sides i would have taken it..

stop moaning and chill out..
its not boring is it?
its drama..
always has been
always will be
wouldnt have it any other way..

[Quaz]

Pete is mates with Paladini, I understand why he feels some loyalty towards him, I really do.

I'm not really angry with Pete per se, but he is pretty much a lone voice in defending his incompetence, and as such has become a focus for the frustration. I'm angry with Paladini, and I'm angry with the club.

What he has done would have resulted in a dismissal in most businesses. Why not at our club?

why not at our club?

good question, but then take a look at our owners, not exactly the most innocent of people are they.
If you wanted your own way would you employ a yes man or somone who would stand up to you....

[bushcelt1]

simple really.

Pete's always denied it, but if he is in paladini's pocket, then clearly this board was set up with the express intention of peddling paladini's interests rather than those of the fans it is supposed to represent.

I'd say that's fairly important. Surely you can see that?

are you saying this messageboard is gp's baby???? Not too sure about that.

[terry ball]

Pete I admire your loyalty, shame you couldn't off done the same with Paulo Sousa

[sirpiechucker]

Apologies to all on A friday night.

You are right.............

We were so much happier in League 1, I do apologise.

Don't know what came over me.

Roll on the Chesterfield and Wycombe's of this world.

Silly ****ing waiter should never be anywhere near this football club.

Lets take some militant action against him......

I'd still love and follow QPR if we were in Luton's position. The last few years have been nothing but shame and embarrassment. I'd rather watch league one and be regarded as everyones '2nd team' then the mess that we are now. It wasn't long ago when people used to say 'you support QPR I've always had a soft spot for them'. Now they think we are cheats or the team who charge ridiculous money for rubbish seats, or the club that beat up the Chinese or the team 'buying' success. I'd honestly prefer my QPR back then Premiership football.

[Quaz]

Pete I admire your loyalty, shame you couldn't off done the same with Paulo Sousa

pmsl, same old stuff

[qblockpete]

I am just giving a different viewpoint thats all.

You cannot suggest all that are anti him are right all of the time? Likewise, I cannot be right all of the time?

Problem is, when I say something its "puppet", "poodle", "in his pocket" or whatever else is dreamed up.

Thats why your arguments cannot be viewed subjectively, because if its something you disagree with, you just find a personal insult or vindicative comment

If you give an opinion its pretty much accepted, not much personal insults from me

if I give an opinion, I am "puppet".

It shows a weakness of an argument, if it goes down that level.

kids of 6-7 do that in the playground.


The truth is normally somewhere in the middle....................

[twranger]

bobby, lol , very well put and true

[qblockpete]

Yep, you'll right in hindsight should have remained loyal to Paulo.

We would have been so much better off with his "project"

[bushcelt1]

Sousa was pony....laters.

[Quaz]

nothing wrong with a little bit of `dodgy`
it`s in the QPR DNA
most succesful periods in our history involved a bit of wideboy flair
jim gregory and rodney marsh-i was there
flying by the seat of our pants
john bloom (washing machines)
stan bowles
terry venables
now a real maverick in adel
bernie flavio gp- yeh well dodgy
mittals probably even dodgier
so what?
this is a golden time
this is west london
if i was asked to cough up 200 quid more on my season ticket at the start of the season
in exchange for maybe tucking up a few premiership sides i would have taken it..

stop moaning and chill out..
its not boring is it?
its drama..
always has been
always will be
wouldnt have it any other way..

this