e-mail from QPR

[jfish]

Not sure about the quote from the fans but other than that quite believable..

[James1979]

I'm not overly keen on the way these two behave, or at least the impression they give.

However, instead of just blurting out the phrase, "Bu11sh1t", surely there are quite an interesting couple of points in there, that would not be wise to mention if they were untrue.

Maybe, we will get a grown up discussion on it.

totally agree. I am a big fan of amit and the mittals but to be honest it didn't have too much substance to it. Amit has used the media and put qpr through the press this week, maybe bernie and flavio have been funding their share and maybe there has been no offer. It's interesting to see the other side of the argument. I always think the truth is somewhere in the middle.

[80sCasual]

Not sure about the quote from the fans but other than that quite believable..

Yeah and where's the quotes from the fans who have disagreed and F & B's answers to them?

[indianalondon]

Not sure about the quote from the fans but other than that quite believable..

In PR terms this is what is called "Crisis Management" - they know the fans are against them in general (on this current situation), they know the fans are with Amit, again, in general.

And in addition, ST sales are very much down in comparison to this point last year as far as renewals go.

I would suggest though that they actually get a decent PR company!

I omitted it but by putting an employee's name at the bottom of it is nothing short of disgusting IMHO.

[jackbauerQPR]

What the fckin hell is that? Absolutely laughable and worrying. Worst sh1t I've ever read.

[qpr]

One Thing From This E-Mail That Has Annoyed Me!

Bhatia appears to be using the press to try to force the price of any deal down, which is disrespectful to both the Club and its fans.

I'm sorry what

Not having an open top bus parade was embrassing and I didn't know what to say when people asked why we didn't have one, yet i've seen every other team do one including Norwich.

The FA court case ruined the season for me totally, when I wrote a facebook status after the Watford game about being Champions the first reply was " Aren't QPR being docked points though ? "

I'm on the Npower Banter Page on facebook and people keep going on about us cheating ( Though they don't let facts get in the way of what they want to believe ) That's embrassing.

I keep being asked is it true it costs £70 odd for a ticket next season ?

On top of these prices we aren't targetting Chamakh / Defoe, the players you should be targetting if you charge fans this much.

Warnocks job is not safe and how embrassing if he gets sacked after winning promotion !!

Though my team have been promoted and i'm very proud of the players and staff i'm still not keen to wear my shirt because of the BS that's happened recently.

Correct me if i'm wrong, but all of that is disrespectful to the fans!

[Bigears]

This is just another move as part of the power struggle.

The point were they say the Mittals are trying to get it on the cheap and this insulting to the fans, is there move to get a higher price. As they know, the fans dont care about how much the cliubs worth we just want owners who care for the club, make funds available for a good footie team that can compete next year.

Just another move in the long game of chess

[rkingy78]

If the price was right I think they would be prepared to sell to Mittel.

[jfish]

In PR terms this is what is called "Crisis Management" - they know the fans are against them in general (on this current situation), they know the fans are with Amit, again, in general.

And in addition, ST sales are very much down in comparison to this point last year as far as renewals go.

I would suggest though that they actually get a decent PR company!

I omitted it but by putting an employee's name at the bottom of it is nothing short of disgusting IMHO.

So you are saying they are lying about the funding they are putting in??

I have a fairly balanced view on all this, there is nothing to say the Mittals were going to provide Warnock with Millions. They didnt back him in January where they could have bought in more players i.e Centre Forward.

I guess we will never know the backing we could have got unless they really are going to come back and take over.

[SteveQPR1975]

Very true ! QPR fc to other clubs ATM are something to take the **** out of

[qpr]

Exactly, even after promotion, it's silly!

[baz]

What they dont say, is they are not prepared to sell. What they do say is the mittals have been funding 33% of the club. What they dont say is whether the request for further funds from the Mittals comes before or after the sacking of the Mittals man for his "handling" of GP's negligence. What they dont say is if any money is available for players, what they do say is that Warnock wont have to sell his best players. What they do say is that season tickets are average for London clubs, what they dont say is walk up prices and away fans tickets are at the Arsenal / Chelsea end of the spectum.

[SteveQPR1975]

Every time ! QPR are mentioned anywhere it always seems to be negative

[themodfather]

we are def losing a million £££ a month ( or where as per last accounts)
why are we losing that amount? it ain't gone on fans.....
so wages must be up and expenditure.

fb and bern apparently are paying up...qpr debts are around the £30m mark....if they want £100m is that to clear debts too,in full??

i can;t recall ishan involved in the faurlin signing nor he saying much on the hearing.
imo, it's all business chat, probably happens a lot in large companies when there are several parties jostling for control.
anyone else feel club statements paint an all is wonderful picture?
as said before IF MR MITTAL WANTED "iN" HE'D DO IT.

[The Leveller]

A not so cleaver and transparent piece of spin and not written due to the grammar used and linguistic style written by a serious or professional person or in this case not passed onto one, assuming it is genuie of course.

As a member of a board there would not be a need to submit a written proposal, there would have been a discussion in the first instance as to whether there was any basis by which a proposal would be well received and an outline on what basis. This would have been discussions about opening up negotiations, nothing more, nothing less. When there is a basis a written proposal setting out the basis and terms, some legally enforceable if appropriate would be stated. So it is clear it did not get beyond first base.

As for the ploy of a call for funds, well if you as a significant shareholder had a call to increasing funding (which again can be legally enforceable subject to the terms of the articles of association in a Limited Company) be happy if you were concerned over events and future direction.

On the matter of the dismissal, again yet another potential expense incurred subject to there being a contract in place, the outstanding period of that term contract would be rolled up and paid in order to avoid a breach of contract claim in a County Court. I find it hard that it was due to the way that the FA Hearing (sic) was handled because it was an excellent piece of legal representation by Ian Mills and the whole legal team. There is more to this than is in this statement and if a genuine statement will only leading to more unanswered questions.

By the way, how does the QPR website ask questions of supporters? As I have a few answers to give.