I read the piece of information from BE and FB as good news. Ignoring the PR crap regarding made up fans statements, the important conclusion is that it looks as if Bernie and Flavio are just after more money. If Mittal's initial price quote, as referred to in media (£50m for Bernies 62% stake, possibly also including Flavios 5% stake, probably only verbally commicated to Bernie) is correct, I understand Bernie is holding out for more. I am confident a second bid will be tabled. In the meantime I think it is vice not to get too distracted by the PR war going on between the two owner groups, where the respective parties try to get supporters on their suide. My support is obviously with the Mittals as I think they will provide more financial support to the club and run it better, but if we end up being owned by Bernie until he finds the right long term owner I can easily live with that. We are Premier League and nothing can ruin my joy of finally being back.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
e-mail from QPR
Collapse
X
-
All this email shows is flabio and the dwarf are getting a bit desperate and are trying spin their way out of a p.r nightmare! The next few weeks are gonna be interesting but not in a good way I think! By the way is there any way to find out who the fans were they spoke to as id love a chat with them!LONDON CALLING TO THE ZOMBIES OF DEATH.... ALSO KNOW AS BRENTFORD FANS
Comment
-
Originally posted by themodfather View Postwe are def losing a million £££ a month ( or where as per last accounts)
why are we losing that amount? it ain't gone on fans.....
so wages must be up and expenditure.
fb and bern apparently are paying up...qpr debts are around the £30m mark....if they want £100m is that to clear debts too,in full??
i can;t recall ishan involved in the faurlin signing nor he saying much on the hearing.
imo, it's all business chat, probably happens a lot in large companies when there are several parties jostling for control.
anyone else feel club statements paint an all is wonderful picture?
as said before IF MR MITTAL WANTED "iN" HE'D DO IT.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by QPROslo View PostI read the piece of information from BE and FB as good news. Ignoring the PR crap regarding made up fans statements, the important conclusion is that it looks as if Bernie and Flavio are just after more money. If Mittal's initial price quote, as referred to in media (£50m for Bernies 62% stake, possibly also including Flavios 5% stake, probably only verbally commicated to Bernie) is correct, I understand Bernie is holding out for more. I am confident a second bid will be tabled. In the meantime I think it is vice not to get too distracted by the PR war going on between the two owner groups, where the respective parties try to get supporters on their suide. My support is obviously with the Mittals as I think they will provide more financial support to the club and run it better, but if we end up being owned by Bernie until he finds the right long term owner I can easily live with that. We are Premier League and nothing can ruin my joy of finally being back.
The main points I take from the statement are:
Ecclestone still reckons he might get more money for the club so hasn't closed the door.
Interesting that the Mitals apparently refused to invest.
Both sides in my view trying to play fans like a banjo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stainrodisalegend View PostA voice of sanity. My advice to fans would be "don't get caught up in the spin operation between both parties."
The main points I take from the statement are:
Ecclestone still reckons he might get more money for the club so hasn't closed the door.
Interesting that the Mitals apparently refused to invest.
Both sides in my view trying to play fans like a banjo.
Comment
-
Originally posted by DominicIorfa View PostI still don't understand why Saksensa get's sacked for his handling of the FA Inquiry in which we got possibly the best result we could have hoped for, yet Paladini was negligent and he's still there!
Can anyone explain that one?
Comment
Comment