Finney on BBC London

[haqpr1963]

haqpr1963 (or should I use your termnology) "mate"

you already muddled the waters by keep asking the same quesitions, which I answered.

I am banned from reports site, he is not banned from here.

You understand, this site allows debate and at times even ridiculing of its joint owner, but he wants to stifle debate. Thats up to him.

But you haven't answered the question, qblockpete......

One last time...

DO YOU DISAGREE WITH ANYTHING THAT FINNEY SAID IN HIS BBC INTERVIEW?

And as an aside, what exactly does your being banned from a site have to do with this thread?????

[qblockpete]

Grow up..

FFS

[Bluehoop]

What?

I would have thought that was a pretty open question. Anyone with a bit of sense would have stated what exactly it was that they disagreed with.

Do you disagree with anything that Finney said? (You might want to avoid using PF or Isleworth might take issue....)

You are deliberately missing the point - you clearly know the history better than most and take great pleasure in coming on this board to wind the bobbin up

You ask such a broad question, get a broad reply and don't therefore get a specific bite and that produces yet another barbed post, and so on and so on............

I haven't listened to the interview and won't be doing so. I have my own views on the Club and my own measure of displeasure at how things are developing and prefer to keep my own counsel.

I am not friends with or known to any of the members of either faction (here or across the pond) and never oppose/abuse or confront anyone whose opinion is different to mine - live and let live, think for yourself and share your wisdom are my only principles.

But I enjoy this message board for its humour, wild sources and rumours and also enjoy the community as a whole - but the recent re-invasion and the mass of wordplay being used to tug the fishing rope is ruining my enjoyment of the place. That's why I say ask a direct question, get your point made and move on.

[haqpr1963]

The INDYS site as I am sure you already aware

Their site their rules and I accept the decision and good luck to them all in the future as I dont intend prolonging any grudges from both sides especially when at this moment in time we should all be on the same side with a common goal

Really, very rarely visit that site.

Don't really see what it has to do with this thread but thanks for the info.

Totally agree we should all be allied on these issues, but it seems that some are torn.......

[Bluehoop]

Pete - what are your thoughts on Paul Finney implying that Mittal/Bhatia couldn't have distanced themselves further from Palladini at theend of the season? Do you think this is true? This isn't a loaded question, I am genuinely interested.

See how easy it is? A direct and specific question that can have a direct and specific answer. Stedders =

[qblockpete]

Stedders

That point is absolute ******s.

Hope that answers your question.

You need to understand, if people are hanging onto the notion that Amit/Mittal takeover will mean the immediate removal of Paladini, they are in for a nasty shock.


If they genuinely want Mittal to take over for the benefit of the club, thats a different matter and I totally agree with them

Two different subjects altogether. I'd be focusing on the benefits to the supporters with Mittal being in control, focus on the ridiculous pricing structure set by the two others for example as opposed to winning brownie points over individuals who would be here whoever was in charge

[haqpr1963]

Stedders

That point is absolute ******s.

Hope that answers your question.

You need to understand, if people are hanging onto the notion that Amit/Mittal takeover will mean the immediate removal of Paladini, they are in for a nasty shock.


If they genuinely want Mittal to take over for the benefit of the club, thats a different matter and I totally agree with them

Two different subjects altogether. I'd be focusing on the benefits to the supporters with Mittal being in control, focus on the ridiculous pricing structure set by the two others for example as opposed to winning brownie points over individuals who would be here whoever was in charge

Why are we now talking about Paladini on this thread.

God and you accuse others of being obsessed......

[qblockpete]

You must be on some pills this morning HAprq1963

Listen to the opening soundbites in the interview.

As I said entirely agree with him on season ticket prices and matchday tickets

[Stanley]

To be fair, Pete has been asked a straightforward and specific question on this thread, which he has evaded answering directly, and we all know the reasons why. End of.

[jonno]

Stedders

That point is absolute ******s.

Hope that answers your question.

You need to understand, if people are hanging onto the notion that Amit/Mittal takeover will mean the immediate removal of Paladini, they are in for a nasty shock.
If they genuinely want Mittal to take over for the benefit of the club, thats a different matter and I totally agree with them

Two different subjects altogether. I'd be focusing on the benefits to the supporters with Mittal being in control, focus on the ridiculous pricing structure set by the two others for example as opposed to winning brownie points over individuals who would be here whoever was in charge

Really? We'll see on that.....

[terry ball]

But why bring it up it has nothing to do with this thread and simply muddies the waters.......

That's his style, cross- board stirer then plays the victim card

[terry ball]

To be fair, Pete has been asked a straightforward and specific question on this thread, which he has evaded answering directly, and we all know the reasons why. End of.

He's got a great nack of dodging questions, a bit similar to paladini at the the hearing. Two casts from the same mould, both with hidden interests and their own personal gains at heart. Sad really

[UpperP]

Stedders

That point is absolute ******s.

Hope that answers your question.

You need to understand, if people are hanging onto the notion that Amit/Mittal takeover will mean the immediate removal of Paladini, they are in for a nasty shock.


If they genuinely want Mittal to take over for the benefit of the club, thats a different matter and I totally agree with them

Two different subjects altogether. I'd be focusing on the benefits to the supporters with Mittal being in control, focus on the ridiculous pricing structure set by the two others for example as opposed to winning brownie points over individuals who would be here whoever was in charge

Correct me if I'm wrong but wasn't one of the reasons named for Amit's resignation that BE and FB wanted to keep GP?

[haqpr1963]

To be fair, Pete has been asked a straightforward and specific question on this thread, which he has evaded answering directly, and we all know the reasons why. End of.

good point. I think I will leave it there....

[IsleworthRanger]

That's his style, cross- board stirer then plays the victim card

Did not think it would be too long before you crawled out from under your stone but it was HAQPR who raised the point of a messageboard taking all views regardless of the opinions posted and I mentioned that it was not the case elsewhere at one time

I suggest you read postings a little more closely before attempting to be a lot more clever then you actually are