Originally posted by Bernie's Barnet
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
This is all the Mittal's fault
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by qblockpete View PostEnd of the day Amit is a peoples person.
Flavio and Bernie put there foots in it and look on everyday fans as purely punters. They treat it simply as a business.
Would say in their defence, they have put a good percentage of the money and backing this season
Comment
-
This Flav & Bernie are 'Majority shareholders'
Where do people keep getting Flav from, I thought he had now taken a step back.
Bernie is the majority shareholder alone followed by Mittal still with 33%, if I am correct.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.Queens Park RangersNPower Champions 2010/2011
PREMIER LEAGUE 2011 - ETERNITY (Oh well got that wrong, we'll be back though)
Comment
-
Originally posted by kron-1664 View PostIndians dont ever bid a reasonable amount. I have dealt witrh them for long enough to know this.
How do you think they got where they are, by underpaying for every business they bought into.
Eccelston has publically quoted he values the club at 100ml.
Do you think that is a resonable price.
Blackburn Rovers some what established Prem club was bought for 30ml.
Do you think Mr Mittal should pay any price asked of them.
They have top people working for them and knows the value of a club.
Do you think Mr Mittal underpaid for the house he bought from the same person (Eccelston).
Comment
-
Originally posted by mjenner View Posti understand Ecclestone been putting in £900k a month for the last 2 years to fund what the club loses every month. £35million i would turn that down as well, £100m is too much but £50m min i would say.
Amit has resigned because they lost their bid nothing to do with season ticket hike, that's my view anyway.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bhujio View PostDon't make a general assumption.
How do you think they got where they are, by underpaying for every business they bought into.
Eccelston has publically quoted he values the club at 100ml.
Do you think that is a resonable price.
Blackburn Rovers some what established Prem club was bought for 30ml.
Do you think Mr Mittal should pay any price asked of them.
They have top people working for them and knows the value of a club.
Do you think Mr Mittal underpaid for the house he bought from the same
person (Eccelston).
Bhuto you are absolutely right to highlight the casual racism on here.
Comment
-
Originally posted by californiahoop View PostWhat I want to know is why did they allow is to think the Mittals had or where going to take a more active role when in fact 1 1/2 men have been in charge all along.Originally posted by kron-1664 View PostIndians dont ever bid a reasonable amount. I have dealt witrh them for long enough to know this.
A good point was made by one of the other posters regarding Blackburn, they paid 30m for an estlablished prem club, the difference is London, QPR could/will be bigger than Blackburn, and if what I gave read is correct, half punt has been bankrolling the club and is well within his rights to ask for more than 35m.
So the Mittals should out up or shut up.Kept the faith!
Comment
-
Originally posted by 80sCasual View PostThis Flav & Bernie are 'Majority shareholders'
Where do people keep getting Flav from, I thought he had now taken a step back.
Bernie is the majority shareholder alone followed by Mittal still with 33%, if I am correct.
Feel free to correct me if I am wrong.
I read somewhere that Briatore in one way or the other can get his percentage of the shares back from Bernie.QPR
Best team in the world
Sort of
Comment
-
Originally posted by californiahoop View PostWhat I want to know is why did they allow is to think the Mittals had or where going to take a more active role when in fact 1 1/2 men have been in charge all along.Originally posted by Shania View PostI read somewhere that Briatore in one way or the other can get his percentage of the shares back from Bernie.Kept the faith!
Comment
Comment