Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Did Amit leave because he failed to buy out QPR?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • alexferguson60
    Bronze Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 640

    #1

    Did Amit leave because he failed to buy out QPR?

    I know that Amit left because the club refused to do anything about firing Gianni Paladini after the FA shenanigans and 'price increases' at the club, but I think there's another reason: he failed to buy out QPR.

    As soon as the buyout was a failure, his position was untenable.

    If we're honest, the deal for QPR should have been done when we were in the crapper in the middle of last season. It wasn't, and now it's more expensive.

    Thoughts?
  • PutneyHoop
    Apprentice
    • Jul 2010
    • 166

    #2
    It's not too late.

    Comment

    • lymehoop
      Gold Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 7380

      #3
      think your right, but expect the Mittals to be back with an increased offer
      I must away now, I can no longer tarry
      This morning's tempest I have to cross
      I must be guided without a stumble
      Into the arms I love the most

      Comment

      • stan_bowles
        CCG
        • Mar 2009
        • 8391

        #4
        Good point mate.

        Yeah,if the Mittals attempted a buyout,which Ecclestone denied he knew anything about last weekend,failed,then yes,Amit was in a difficult position and had to resign.

        The plot thickens.

        Comment

        • Ric-Roc

          #5
          Why did he / they turn down Flavio's shares when offered them 6 months ago?

          Allegedly. If true massive schoolboy error.

          Comment

          • stan_bowles
            CCG
            • Mar 2009
            • 8391

            #6
            Originally posted by Ric-Roc
            Why did he / they turn down Flavio's shares when offered them 6 months ago?

            Allegedly. If true massive schoolboy error.
            Was it true or just rumours Ric?.

            Comment

            • alexferguson60
              Bronze Seat
              • Mar 2009
              • 640

              #7
              Originally posted by stan_bowles
              Good point mate.

              Yeah,if the Mittals attempted a buyout,which Ecclestone denied he knew anything about last weekend,failed,then yes,Amit was in a difficult position and had to resign.

              The plot thickens.
              Of course - and I think Amit told the press- (or someone employed by him) that the Mittals were 'steeling' for a bid for QPR last week. This infuriated Ecclestone. The next thing? There has been a bid 'behind closed doors', and Bhatia leaves with the PR and fanbase applauding him.

              Paladini should have been fired, though.

              Comment

              • Ric-Roc

                #8
                Originally posted by stan_bowles
                Was it true or just rumours Ric?.
                I would very much like to know the answer to that mate.

                Comment

                • Sotonsuperhoop
                  Silver Seat
                  • May 2009
                  • 1305

                  #9
                  When BE bought FB's shares there was a clause saying that if BE wants to sell FB has first refusal so The Mittals where never gonna take complete control. FB would not have let it happen.

                  What I can't understand is why BE wants to stick around after saying on more than one occaision he wants out and that he didn't want the additional hassle of owning a premiership club. Am I missing something?
                  22nd February away v Charlton is the 40th Anniversary of my support of QPR and my first game. Away v Chelsea 3-3 23rd Feb 1974. 40 years of pure magic!!

                  Comment

                  • QPROslo
                    Silver Seat
                    • Dec 2010
                    • 1137

                    #10
                    If Mittal's highest bid was really £35m (presumably his valuation of 100% of the company), as has been mentioned on this messageboard, I have some sympathy for Bernie not selling. I think he holds out for other potential investors willing to pay considerably more for a London based Premier League club - like a rich sheik or any other billionaire wanting to feed his ego. I won't rule out he can get £100m for it (= £62m for his 62% stake)

                    I believe Bernie will find a buyer in the not too distant future (during coming season) as I do not think he is in this for the long run, and I do not rule out it might be Mittal (based on an improved offer), possibly Mittal together with a partner. Last word is not said.

                    Moreover, Bernie is too smart to offload Warnock, which will be both costly and a stupid decision from a business point of view.

                    Comment

                    • qblockpete
                      C Club
                      • Mar 2009
                      • 22186

                      #11
                      They definitely had opportunity last season after Warnock came to the club and am pretty sure thats what all the talks were about last week
                      ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                      THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                      Comment

                      • Stanley
                        Guest
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 23693

                        #12
                        Originally posted by QPROslo
                        If Mittal's highest bid was really £35m (presumably his valuation of 100% of the company)
                        Not necessarily 100%.

                        Maybe it was just for a controlling share (51%)...

                        Comment

                        • waterbuffalo
                          Banned
                          • Mar 2009
                          • 3642

                          #13
                          Originally posted by lymehoop
                          think your right, but expect the Mittals to be back with an increased offer
                          well said, well said, in business
                          everything is in a constant state of negotiation
                          look at that #### at Arsenal, Stan Kroenke, he's been
                          trying to hold majority shares for years...he never gave up,
                          he wanted Arsenal, and now he's got it.

                          Comment

                          • waterbuffalo
                            Banned
                            • Mar 2009
                            • 3642

                            #14
                            Moreover, Bernie is too smart to offload Warnock, which will be both costly and a stupid decision from a business point of view.


                            Exactly, Oslo. If a Moroccan Billionaire, (they might have a couple) came in, what's wrong with that? Could be a chinaman from hongkong, a ####, a russian, look we are already in the premiership, a hat-trick from Adel , a couple of good results, who knows?
                            Somebody will come in and say, I will give you 150 million pounds, I want in. I want the whole kit and kaboodle. Bernie and Flavio clean up and we move on.

                            Comment

                            Working...