If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Very Important Week Behind The Scenes..Starts Monday
The potential cash backing behind a complete Mittal takeover would be very welcome and signal the possibility of very good times to come. However, I don't think we should underestimate the benefits of having Ecclestone in charge. Sure, he doesn't seem have any emotional attachment to the club but is that necessarily a bad thing? We only have think of the recent Chris Wright era to know that having a hoops fan or someone 'bitten by the bug' is no marker for success in running the club. Ecclestone will at least keep us on a sound footing and not run us into a finannical abbyss like Portsmouth experienced.
I would definitely prefer the Mittals to be at the helm but on the other hand I don't think we will do too badly if things stay as they are.
Your favourite word reality isn't it. Reality is your ****-eing your knickers about when Uncle Geeps gravy train is derailed
Answer me this Pete. If you really love QPR, you would want all facets of it to be perfect, right??
Do you honestly believe the way Paladini conducts himself is good for QPR ?
From the Hills of Kerry
To the streets of Free Derry
Commercially the best person we could ever want on board is Bernie. There is no better person, with this guys contacts, to be able to pull additional partners/sponsor/commercial revenue into the club.
Your favourite word reality isn't it. Reality is your ****-eing your knickers about when Uncle Geeps gravy train is derailed
Answer me this Pete. If you really love QPR, you would want all facets of it to be perfect, right??
Do you honestly believe the way Paladini conducts himself is good for QPR ?
Just thinking along similar, yet slightly different (!) lines
Irrespective of your feelings for GP Pete, would you not admit that if the club had the opportunity to replace him with someone who can perform his role better, they should do just that?
We have players who are replaced by better options, we have managers who are replaced by better options, why shouldn't the same happen to off field employees as well?
i would have preferd to keep all of them,i think that its unlikely the mittals would just give us millions of pound to spend on players so,we really need
to keep all our millionairs i also think its likely that if flavio and bernie leave the mittals will also leave us
i would have preferd to keep all of them,i think that its unlikely the mittals would just give us millions of pound to spend on players so,we really need
to keep all our millionairs i also think its likely that if flavio and bernie leave the mittals will also leave us
Keeping them all on board (as near equal partners) cannot be a bad thing. Ecclestone and Mittal bring different strengths to the table and we can benefit (and have benefited) from this.
MerryPloughBoy....move on, WE ARE IN THE PREMIER LEAGUE
I know we are sweetheart.... I've been buzzing all week
Didn't answer the question though did you?
Me thinks you support Paladini more than QPR as their is much more personal gain. Does he pay you in doughnuts?
From the Hills of Kerry
To the streets of Free Derry
Comment