Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

3 weeks away from new owners/investor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by iheartwegerle View Post
    Agree with you Nodge, but (and I stand to be corrected here, probably by The Leveller) I would have thought that to successfully sue The Sun, we would have to prove that the loss was a direct result of their article.
    The FA can argue all night long that they would have come to the decision on the evidence anyway but they still cannot gainsay the suggestion that the decision was taken in advance. If there is an FA source, the proceedings will flush him out. ( Jordan might give evidence if he can substantiate his 'knowledge')

    What the court will want to know is that, given that the charges were in the public domain and that it was common knowledge that a hearing was pending, what was the Sun's motive in attempting to prejudice the case , quoting an alleged FA source which has since been disavowed by the FA. Why in any case did the Journo cite it without checking its authenticity. Moreover, the FA could have disavowed it before challenged by our lawyers. It is actionable not only to cause a loss but also to seek to bring it about. This will open up a whole can of worms in connection with the Formula One issue.

    The FA could even seek to sue the Sun for maliciously misrepresenting them which might cause the latter to throw their informant to the wolves i.e it was your own employee etc.

    I can see us seking exemplary dangers in addition

    Comment


    • #32
      Curtis called Palios and asks what he thinksand bingo, there is your back page story, with Palios doing the rounds in BBC etc, etc

      Comment


      • #33
        The only party who brought the game into disrepute is the FA with the 3rd party charges. It took them 5 months to gather evidence and a further two for the hearing to take place.

        They have fined QPR £800K probably to pay their legal fees.

        Comment


        • #34
          Originally posted by Jamie View Post
          Mittals + Investor, possible deal been on the cards for ages. Good relations & seamless transfer of power.
          Brothers in Waiting

          Comment


          • #35
            I just want the Mittals to stay, they clearly love the club.

            Flavio turns up so respec taaaa to him
            Under Les Ferdinand:
            Luke Freeman, top assists in the league: 4million
            Alex Smithies, great goalie for this club: 3,5million
            Charlie Austin, 19 Premier League goals: 4million
            Jack Robinson: Contract ran out, left for free
            And many more mistakes

            LES FERDINAND, IT'S TIME TO GO

            Comment


            • #36
              Hope its Lsakshmi mate Mallya, maybe between the 2 of them they might buy out Bernie as he really isn't interested in Rangers(his words not mine),and take the club on to the next step of establising ourselves as a Premiership club, and going on to win things.

              Comment

              Working...
              X