Paladini

[qblockpete]

Russranger

Its down to each individual...

If you think I am biased, than articles by Northern R could be described as biased the other way. Its how you read them and if you are an articulate writer like Northern R, its understandable why the written would be believed.

rangersw12 I did and so did Isleworthranger.

The problem is the charge against him was not proved (ie not guilty)

[qblockpete]

Am I the only one who is really bored with this subject?

No more from me on this subject

We are premiership and thats all we all really wanted.

This next time next year we'll probably be blaming WArnock for getting Bradley orr or Clint Hill; to mark Wayne Rooney.

Lets just enjoy the moment It might not come around for a very long time

[IsleworthRanger]

I thought both Pete and Isleworth agreed that if we were guilty then Paladini should go what has changed ?

Nothings changed for me

[terry ball]

Russranger

Its down to each individual...

If you think I am biased, than articles by Northern R could be described as biased the other way. Its how you read them and if you are an articulate writer like Northern R, its understandable why the written would be believed.

rangersw12 I did and so did Isleworthranger.

The problem is the charge against him was not proved (ie not guilty)

but he was guilty of bringing the charges against the club, right?

[Olly]

There's one undisputable fact here. There's not one person on this MB who knows exactly what went on at the time, who sanctioned what, who was told to sanction what, and what went on at the hearing. Fact.

And I have been told before, that what goes in disciplinary hearings is only betwen them, the club involved, and nobody else. So don't expect transcripts.

Some organisations need to have people to be unpopular or fall guys, and they will stay regardless of whatever other people think. Maybe Ali Russel had something to do with it too.

We have one of the biggest sporting guilty crooks running our club in the shape of Briatore. Why don't you start on him? His financial affairs go through various companies as do GP's, no big deal.

Are all the GP complainers squeaky clean in their own jobs? The people that run this club can pay themselves whatever they all agree on, it's theirs.

[RussRanger]

Pete,I have no preference over you or Northern R. It's just that his argument seems to be an awful lot stronger than yours and based on my own (and many others) opinion the right opinion to adopt. Each to their own but I will not support Paladini, given the reasons I said in my earlier post.

I cannot keep defending the guy every six months because he's done something to make us a laughing stock. I shouldn't have to, I'm just an ordinary fan sick and tired of the unnecessary ridicule he bestows upon the club I love. And every time, his name crops up. It's not a co-incidence, is it?

[Rangersw12]

Pete,I have no preference over you or Northern R. It's just that his argument seems to be an awful lot stronger than yours and based on my own (and many others) opinion the right opinion to adopt. Each to their own but I will not support Paladini, given the reasons I said in my earlier post.

I cannot keep defending the guy every six months because he's done something to make us a laughing stock. I shouldn't have to, I'm just an ordinary fan sick and tired of the unnecessary ridicule he bestows upon the club I love. And every time, his name crops up. It's not a co-incidence, is it?

[Hoopaman]

One charge against Paladini not proven. Which means the other was.

http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/Disciplinary/NewsAndFeatures/2011/queens-park-rangers-sanction-result

changes nothing, but Pete did say if he was found guilty.....

The whole thing should never of happened.

[terry ball]

Pete,I have no preference over you or Northern R. It's just that his argument seems to be an awful lot stronger than yours and based on my own (and many others) opinion the right opinion to adopt. Each to their own but I will not support Paladini, given the reasons I said in my earlier post.

I cannot keep defending the guy every six months because he's done something to make us a laughing stock. I shouldn't have to, I'm just an ordinary fan sick and tired of the unnecessary ridicule he bestows upon the club I love. And every time, his name crops up. It's not a co-incidence, is it?

Great post and 2 particular points that that any true rangers fan can't deny feeling. Expect no response