One for legal eagle type bods

[iheartwegerle]

If we win the case, could we be due any damages or costs? If the FA have really made a balls up would we go after them?

[swanleyhoop]

We should all, including the players, sue them for the mental distress and the impairment of our enjoyment of what should have been a fantastic run-in to this season.
Hard to measure, and at the same time beyond measure.

Very hard to do in law, but individuals have launched successful compensation claims for the streess cause by wrongful arrest etc.

[iheartwegerle]

We should all, including the players, sue them for the mental distress and the impairment of our enjoyment of what should have been a fantastic run-in to this season.
Hard to measure, and at the same time beyond measure.

Very hard to do in law, but individuals have launched successful compensation claims for the streess cause by wrongful arrest etc.

I should sue for repetative strain injury from pressing F5 so much!!

I would have thought the club might have some redress if the allegations are proven untrue. We've basically been accused of cheating which is a fairly hefty thing if it's not true.

[sw66]

I agree - mental health seriously being effected.
My boss will want to sue due tothe lack of work i have been producing this week
I want to sue for the delay in my bet being paid out and all the asprins i have taken.
How much per minute can i claim for lack of sleep. So far around 72 hours.

[The Leveller]

If we win the case, could we be due any damages or costs? If the FA have really made a balls up would we go after them?

First I will go for Chrome/google as it does not like this site, it keeps crashing so now on IE and who then owns the server for my BP being all over the place.

This is my last attempt.

Malicious falsehood is unless there is something new which comes out is the nearest mountable claim. It is a statement which has been published maliciously which causes or is likely to cause financial loss to the claimant.

In the case of malicious falsehood the following elements and tests need to be established and applied:

That the person or body that published the statement did so knowing it was false or did not care whether it was false or not.

Financial loss has to have been caused or is likely to have been caused.
It is therefore hard to pursue this line, as the malicious intent needs to be proven, as does the falsehood and the financial loss. The FA is acting within its rules to pursue the course of action providing there is a basis by which to do so.

So in summary no is your answer.

[mikeyhg]

We shouldn't because we bought a south american, around the time when the rules were being changed and inflated the price so there was a rightful invesitgation, whether guilty or not is another thing but they had a right to be suspicious.