IF...this turns out to be a case of us telling porkies about transfer fees to look like we are spending loads....should the culprit be sacked?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
IF...this turns out to be....
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Gloucs_R View PostIF...this turns out to be a case of us telling porkies about transfer fees to look like we are spending loads....should the culprit be sacked?
Cant really sack himself can he.
Bit unfair on Paladini to take the can if he was made to say 3.5 mill under orders from Flav.
-
Originally posted by Gloucs_R View PostIF...this turns out to be a case of us telling porkies about transfer fees to look like we are spending loads....should the culprit be sacked?
Comment
-
Originally Posted by EYR
Its just like telling your pals you nobbed a bird when really all you did was share a taxi home. Next thing the bird turns up in your local and sets your pals straight.
Are you Olly in disguise?
LOFL That made me spit me tea#standuptocancer
#inyourfacecancer
Comment
-
At the time he was signed they said it was a deal worth 3.5m, not he was signed for 3.5m. There is a huge difference. Some fans were desperate for us to spend millions, hence the wording and they were confused by it. In reality the deal could include signing on fee, wages, payment to Inter who had first refusal etc etc....
Comment
-
Originally posted by BUSHRANGER1982 View PostI'm pretty sure that decision would be taken out of the club's hands, as the FA would place sanctions on Mr. Paladini ensuring his inability to hold any sort of position in English football.
I am not saying he would not deserve it but I doubt the FA would have the powers to ban him as such from QPR or any other club in some capacity if not as a Director
Comment
Comment