Originally posted by Goddard
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
A worrying read?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Nodge70 View PostTwo points here...
Seperate competitions yes, but perfectly allowable for points deductions to be carried over. Precedent set with Boston being deducted points from the National Conference, carried over into the Football League and vice versa IIRC with Chester, Luton and, I believe Darlington, taking points penalties down with them. Obviously the PL is an entirely seperate entity to the FC so they may have a different view but there's no reason to believe they would not allow the penalty to carry through.
We have 14 days to appeal, which must be heard within 28 days subsequent to the appeal being lodged - which would take us well beyond the end of this season. I've not seen this personally but has been quoted in various documentation floating around and is consistent with the appeal time frames previously applied.
.
Comment
-
Originally posted by dpmd View PostI thought Barrack was a Hammer?
Another rumour for the boyos in Cardiff to chew on.
Surely that should mean a 25 point deduction for QPR.
So I've heard.Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM
Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard
Comment
-
Originally posted by Goddard View PostObama is an Iron??
Another rumour for the boyos in Cardiff to chew on.
Surely that should mean a 25 point deduction for QPR.
So I've heard.
Comment
-
Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM
Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard
Comment
-
Originally posted by Goddard View PostObama is an Iron??
Another rumour for the boyos in Cardiff to chew on.
Surely that should mean a 25 point deduction for QPR.
So I've heard.Faurlin is my hero!!! Love him!!! #########
Comment
-
Originally posted by W12_Ranger View PostTo be fair I think this guy has done some good research and has put his argument across pretty well.
Clutching at straws maybe, but a few points I hadn't thought about previously.
I remember the Swindon case too and it doesn't fill me with confidence knowing that at least 5 Blue Sq Leage sides have had points deducted this season by the FA for irregularities. Why should QPR be let off with just a fine?
Comment
-
Originally posted by stanistheman View PostI remember the Swindon case too and it doesn't fill me with confidence knowing that at least 5 Blue Sq Leage sides have had points deducted this season by the FA for irregularities. Why should QPR be let off with just a fine?
Precedent for unregistered agent = 30k fine.
No ineligible players.
No administration.
Submitting false info -- largest punishment for this was a 4 point deduction for many false documents submitted over a long period of time -- not one document submitted ONCE.
The burden of proof of deception is on the FA -- we are not obliged to prove ourselves innocent. Without proof, in law there can be no punishment.
I wish we could ban all threads on this right NOW -- people need to get themselves informed -- I've posted (and so have many others) the above so many times I'm sick of it.
OUR CASE IS NOTHING LIKE SWINDON'S FFS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
WE HAVE NOT FIELDED AN INELIGIBLE PLAYER AND HAVE NOT BEEN CHARGED WITH DOING SO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
:rage:Faurlin is my hero!!! Love him!!! #########
Comment
-
Originally posted by EYR View PostFunny when Cardiff were 2nd they didnt give a hoot about points deductions.Now they are staring down at the play offs theyve all piped up.
Desperate people.
(Cardiff fans, not hubbies.)Faurlin is my hero!!! Love him!!! #########
Comment
-
-
Brighton... Thanks for the response, I have been looking forward to your response all day. From my understanding the club have said there was no deliberate wrong doing, which to me says "we may have done something wrong but not intentionally" is that not how you see it?.. Whether he has deliberately mislead the authorities or not is irrelevant, the fact of the matter is he has cocked up with the paperwork and the club has been bought into disrepute again by him. If he is responsible for overseeing these aspects then there should be no **** ups and everything should be done spot on, i's dotted and t's crossed, no excuses for errors that could cost the club.
Unfortunatly trouble seems to follow him around and yet again he is defending himself and this time the club as well infront of the authorities, this can not be allowed to happen ever again.
As a poster who likes to stay balanced, I'm sure you can see where I'm coming from
Comment
-
Originally posted by terry ball View PostBrighton... Thanks for the response, I have been looking forward to your response all day. From my understanding the club have said there was no deliberate wrong doing, which to me says "we may have done something wrong but not intentionally" is that not how you see it?.. Whether he has deliberately mislead the authorities or not is irrelevant, the fact of the matter is he has cocked up with the paperwork and the club has been bought into disrepute again by him. If he is responsible for overseeing these aspects then there should be no **** ups and everything should be done spot on, i's dotted and t's crossed, no excuses for errors that could cost the club.
Unfortunatly trouble seems to follow him around and yet again he is defending himself and this time the club as well infront of the authorities, this can not be allowed to happen ever again.
As a poster who likes to stay balanced, I'm sure you can see where I'm coming from
Comment
Comment