Apparently still struggling with Abdominal problem - doubt for Saturday.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Adel
Collapse
X
-
I'd take the rare opportunity to go 4-4-2.
With HH and Miller up front together.Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM
Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard
Comment
-
I think the players are experienced enough to know how to play 4-4-2 by now.Originally posted by paulmason View PostThey do not train to play 4-4-2, so why do that ?
4-3-3 yes, 4-5-1 yes, but 4-4-2, with two players holding is suicide.
Hardly a radical system for them.
NW probably wont play a 4-4-2, that's fine by me.
But it's what I would like to see them try at Scunny, because 4-4-2 is too risky with Adel in the team.
Derry can hold, Faurlin joins in more. Smith and Routledge track back enough naturally.
Without Adel, it's easy enough.
But like I said, wont happen anyway.Final Version - Hope you like it: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d1z0UQ0eqRM
Follow Me On Twitter: http://twitter.com/#!/QPRGoddard
Comment
-
As long as we win, I don't care what system we play or who plays in it, but evey interview NW does, he mentions the system we play and the only time it seems to change from 4-2-3-1, is when we are going for it and it becomes a more 4-2-1-3 formation. Even Capello has finally agreed that 4-4-2 is boring/crap.Originally posted by Goddard View PostI think the players are experienced enough to know how to play 4-4-2 by now.
Hardly a radical system for them.
NW probably wont play a 4-4-2, that's fine by me.
But it's what I would like to see them try at Scunny, because 4-4-2 is too risky with Adel in the team.
Derry can hold, Faurlin joins in more. Smith and Routledge track back enough naturally.
Without Adel, it's easy enough.
But like I said, wont happen anyway.
Comment

Comment