Tweet
At best, gross incompetence.
At worst, criminal.
At worst, criminal.
-
-
He has to go even if he isn't found guilty! -
As I have said Nodge, regardless what happens he now should be given the pump or simply walk.
I cannot see him being in his usual seat Saturday?? Surely.
He will bring this club down if he continues here.Comment
-
So if we are found NOT guilty of any charges, he has to go?
Can I just remind you the Bristol City chairman is still there after a similar case and they got found guilty.ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/Comment
-
IMO Yes.Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
It's a monumental **** up at best and other clubs (who don't always have 100% confidence in dealing with us over transfers) will be reluctant to deal. Given the rule changes post Tevez and West Ham, this should have been easily and professionally dealt with and checked off stage by stage with the Club's legal reps, Club Secretary and the League. It wasn't and it's a huge mess of one person's making.
NB - the Lansdown/BCFC case is totally different.Last edited by Guest; 10-03-2011, 10:33 AM.Comment
-
If we are not guilty then he should not be sacked for this situation. However, if we are found not guilty but the case report says we have been grossly incompetent, then he has to go. He seems happy to fire others at will, what goes around comes around...Comment
-
fair enough.
I'd just rather find the FA findings first, which need to be dealt with ASAPALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/Comment
-
Wow! as a character you really are beyond parody, you'll never see a QPR match again.Originally posted by qblockpete View PostComment
-
He will be found guilty of dealing with as dodgy agent, so you can forget all the if this, if that nonsense.Originally posted by Stedders View PostComment
-
Tend to agree - but GP should really be placed on gardening leave whilst those investigations are carried out.Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
It would be heartbreaking if one person's error (which in fairness could be genuine) cost us promotion.
Perhaps Ian Holloway can provide some tips on pruning the roses.Last edited by Guest; 10-03-2011, 10:38 AM.Comment
-
& still they defend him!
The freebies are over lads, so is your tawdry little role at our football club, yourselves a big favour, stay away.Comment
-
Pete you simply dont understand....Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
"REGARDLESS OF WHETHER HE IS GUILTY OR NOT, THE FACT REMAINS THAT THESE ISSUES KEEP FOLLOWING THE CLUB AND THE ONE COMMON DENOMINATOR; PALADINI..."
The owners do not keep wanting our name dragged through the mud.
It like having a girlfriend who you keep finding at a nightclub with different geezers, she gets in at 4 am every weekend, texts and numbers found in her phone, yet she claims that nothing has happened, time and time again..
Would you stay with her or fark her off??
Comment
-
Do we have the backing of the league ? after all QPR at first delt with the league 2 years ago and it was only when we wanted to extend his contract that all this came about.
If the league did not find any wrong doing by us then, why should the FA ?Comment
-
Because the FL do not have any dedicated invesitgative team to handle such matters.Originally posted by LoftusRoadLad View PostComment
-
Paladini has got to go. He's embarassed our club and our fans. He might have QPR's best interests at heart, but **** me, he's really shot himself in the foot this time.
The word "deliberate" in QPR's statement made me believe that the club think it was gross incompetence.
I don't want an incompetent person in charge of my club - therefore fire Paladini.Comment
Comment