Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

QPR and Paladini charged by the FA...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    You can bet that all the other teams in the playoff hunt will be baying for blood. I am worried.

    Comment


    • #77
      Originally posted by The White City General View Post
      The FA consider that Faurlin, who is a QPR regular played 31 games and has scored twice this season, has been eligible to play because his registration was lodged with the FA.

      The club will be charged with concealing the true nature of his contract from the FA when making that registration.

      The Football League discovered the alleged breach of rules in September last year but as it did not have rules banning third –party ownership at the time he signed the case was passed to the FA.

      The FA allowed QPR to buy out the third-party rights in October 2010 so that the player could continue to play without breaching any rules. At the time QPR announced he had signed a four-year contract extension but did not mention the change in his contractual arrangements.



      Can someone tell me does this sound like wrong doing or just general all round ****ing incompetance?
      doesn't sound like wrong doing to me, seems to be a f*ck with paper work yet again, we do have a history of that.

      Comment


      • #78
        Originally posted by EYR View Post
        So he is eligibe,sureley thats the main one is it not?
        It sounds like it though the Football Laegue seem to be the ones complaining but their rules dont cover this situation

        Very confusing

        Comment


        • #79
          Originally posted by Quaz View Post
          doesn't sound like wrong doing to me, seems to be a f*ck with paper work yet again, we do have a history of that.
          Ahem....has a hint of Tommy Smith/Rob Hulse's transfers about it.


          Its-sanottamyfault-thefaxmachina-wassabroken!

          ****!

          Comment


          • #80
            So Paladini has been so f\/cking stupid there isn't even a rule to describe his shortcomings?

            Superb.

            Comment


            • #81
              Palaf'ingdini again.

              I cant believe I've come home to this. Just when i thought this club was being run well, Palaf'ingdini crops up again.

              At best a fine, at worst no promotion after all the good work done this season.

              I bet our potential buyers will be distancing themselves now. No wonder Bernie wanted out.

              Comment


              • #82
                The odds are drifting already.

                Betfair from 1.33 to 1.40 already.

                This looks so bad.

                Comment


                • #83
                  Originally posted by The White City General View Post
                  Ahem....has a hint of Tommy Smith/Rob Hulse's transfers about it.


                  Its-sanottamyfault-thefaxmachina-wassabroken!

                  ****!

                  It was Pompey stalling on the smith deal dw about that

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    this could take years to sort out.
                    http://twitter.com/Mellowhoop

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Originally posted by The White City General View Post
                      Ahem....has a hint of Tommy Smith/Rob Hulse's transfers about it.


                      Its-sanottamyfault-thefaxmachina-wassabroken!

                      ****!
                      i think its going to be worse than having to wait to sign the players, could mess the whole season up.

                      How many points were luton deducted for wrong doings, and we all laughed.

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        so he's eligible, we just weren't open about all the details.....fine, slap on wrist etc....unlikely to be a point deduction

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Originally posted by James1979 View Post
                          so he's eligible, we just weren't open about all the details.....fine, slap on wrist etc....unlikely to be a point deduction
                          7 counts tho might make it worse.

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Originally posted by James1979 View Post
                            so he's eligible, we just weren't open about all the details.....fine, slap on wrist etc....unlikely to be a point deduction
                            Thats what i thought having read it again and again. Fine for incompetent admin housekeeping hopefully.

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Oh dear...the odds have drifted...the world is ending.

                              If he was ineligible, we may be looking at points. This doesn't seem to be the case. Our promotion money will cover it, and some.

                              Let's not get too ahead of ourselves, eh?
                              Your mum would love me...

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Sounds like the eligibility is the main issue and we haven't done anything wrong on that count?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X