Originally posted by Scarlet pimple
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Forest deserved point
Collapse
X
-
Every time Tarbs or Routledge or Miller got the ball there was two or three players around them, i do think our players sometimes held on to the ball to long, wanted to many touches in front of there back five, bit you have to give them credit for working as hard as they did, they made it very difficult to brake them down.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scarlet pimple View PostWe took the game to reading and won with 10 men, forest never had the bottle to do that against us.Originally posted by Scarlet pimple View PostWell if you noticed they had taarapt and routlidge in their pockets and Hulse was a wast of space.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scarlet pimple View PostExactly.
Playing Hulse is a waste of time. Playing him as almost a lone striker is nothing short of redicilous, especially at home. If you have to play him and Miller, which we did, play them both as target men, Tarbs one side, Routledge the other. What was the point of Miller out wide, as well as he did?
I have a Forest fan mate who is absolutely busting a nut over getting a point. That says it all for me!Fags n weed, glue n speed, but I draws the line at crack !
Comment
-
I thought we would have done better against 11 as they would have come out more like in the 1st half. When a team decides to just defend its difficult to break through and forest did that well. A point will do, gotta take at least 7 from then next 9 IMHO
Comment
-
Originally posted by dtig View PostFinally, at least we're talking about US and not having orgasms over how fu**ing forest deserved a point and defended well!
Playing Hulse is a waste of time. Playing him as almost a lone striker is nothing short of redicilous, especially at home. If you have to play him and Miller, which we did, play them both as target men, Tarbs one side, Routledge the other. What was the point of Miller out wide, as well as he did?
I have a Forest fan mate who is absolutely busting a nut over getting a point. That says it all for me!I must away now, I can no longer tarry
This morning's tempest I have to cross
I must be guided without a stumble
Into the arms I love the most
Comment
-
Originally posted by Scarlet pimple View PostAfter all the bowlocks we have had from them...how they are going to take us apart overrun us, they are the form team...so why didn't they have a go in the 2nd half and why were they so happy to get a point.
Comment
-
Originally posted by kron-1664 View PostI thought we would have done better against 11 as they would have come out more like in the 1st half. When a team decides to just defend its difficult to break through and forest did that well. A point will do, gotta take at least 7 from then next 9 IMHOFags n weed, glue n speed, but I draws the line at crack !
Comment
-
Originally posted by dtig View PostFinally, at least we're talking about US and not having orgasms over how fu**ing forest deserved a point and defended well!
Playing Hulse is a waste of time. Playing him as almost a lone striker is nothing short of redicilous, especially at home. If you have to play him and Miller, which we did, play them both as target men, Tarbs one side, Routledge the other. What was the point of Miller out wide, as well as he did?
I have a Forest fan mate who is absolutely busting a nut over getting a point. That says it all for me!Last edited by Bigdave; 14-02-2011, 07:26 AM.
Comment
Comment