Some on here seemed to think we had uncovered the next Les Ferdinand after twenty minutes as sub the other day. What do they reckon now?
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Miller
Collapse
X
-
did anybody really say that after coventry?
hes decent enough to do a job.Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Please Follow My Twitter
-
Thought Hulse was more of a threat in his came. completely agree that Miller looks a bit static and needs to move the ball quicker once he's got it under control. unfair to judge him until forest game really as both those things will improve with match fitness and game time.15 years in the wilderness will be a distant memory come Sunday 8th May 2011.
Comment
-
Originally posted by moon_safari View PostMiller was terrible yesterday IMO, he won nothing in the air. Might not be his fault just might not suit our system.
I know I will get pelters but I think hulse is the best forward at the club .can bring routs Adel and smith in the game with his flick ons
Comment
-
i see it like this..
if we play long ball we need hulse and helguson.
if we play it on the floor we play miller.
last night we played rugby with miller winning some flick ons. problem like hulse and HH has, is when they win the flick ons, theres NEVER anybody running beyond them.
so that immediately makes the Centre forwards job very difficult. especially since we rarely got our wingers out wide yesterday.Soldier: "im on reconnaissance sir.. im looking for our camouflage expert.. have you seen him?"
Lovejoy: "No?!"
Soldier: "GOD DAMNIT THAT GUYS GOOD!"
Please Follow My Twitter
Comment
Comment