Originally posted by qblockpete
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Oh Dear - Keys now also had it!
Collapse
X
-
This is stupid.. That god awful program loose women that's on every lunchtime is basically a hour of 4 women talking about what they hate about men..
I know football has come a long way and it's all well and good making it a family game in which women are encouraged to come along, but this whole issue now is really annoying the main audience which is us, such a shame..Cant believe it, ive been PWOPER MUGGED ORF...
Comment
-
More football league clubs went bust pre Sky than have during Sky's tenure as the major broadcaster. Lower league football is now richer than it has ever been, with the money feeding down as far as Step 5 of non league football. It's fashionable to knock Sky, but all they do it give clubs money. Stacks of it. With the amount washing around the game, there really is no excuse for well run clubs to go to the wall. It's up to the owners how they spend it or save it. How many clubs with parachute payments actually bounced straight back with the two years? Not very many. Outweighed significantly by those who didn't.
Level playing field before Sky? Do me a favour. Sure, an unfashionable teams made it to the top flight or cup final every now and then (Millwall had a couple of seasons up, Carlisle, Northampton - they are just history's versions of Wigan, Blackpool and Barnsley) but the top flight and the major cups have always been and always will be (mad Sheikh's and Oligarch's aside) absolutely dominated by the same 6 or 8 clubs who have always done so (Liverpool, Man Utd, Arsenal, Everton, Villa, Spurs, Chelsea, City) - same in Europe. Want your Champions League winner? Perm any one from Milan, Madrid, Barca, Bayern or Man Utd.
Sky SAVED football. Does anyone remember exactly how sh1te the overall state of the game was in the 70's and 80's. Facilities in stadiums were outdated at best, lethal at worst. Pitches were akin to ploughed fields, the football played on them, for the most part, just as agricultural. Attendances were at a post war nadir and going further downhill and no-one was interested. Clubs were able to change and to implement the findings of the Taylor report due to the money invested by Sky.
It's all very well being misty eyed and nostalgic for the days of the terraces but don't confuse banter with mates on trains and in pubs up and down the country to the absolute b0llocks served up in the top flight stadiums and how supporters were treated worse than animals. I was there. I remember it. Sky have helped to improve all that by a million per cent.
Plus ca change?
NB - Gray is suing News International for the phone hacking stuff. I'd assume his removal was a pleasant opportunity approved by Rupert.
NB - I do not work for Sky, News International or any of its partners!!!Last edited by Guest; 26-01-2011, 12:23 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nodge70 View PostMore football league clubs went bust pre Sky than have during Sky's tenure as the major broadcaster. Lower league football is now richer than it has ever been, with the money feeding down as far as Step 5 of non league football. It's fashionable to knock Sky, but all they do it give clubs money. Stacks of it. With the amount washing around the game, there really is no excuse for well run clubs to go to the wall. It's up to the owners how they spend it or save it. How many clubs with parachute payments actually bounced straight back with the two years? Not very many. Outweighed significantly by those who didn't.
Level playing field before Sky? Do me a favour. Sure, an unfashionable teams made it to the top flight or cup final every now and then (Millwall had a couple of seasons up, Carlisle, Northampton - they are just history's versions of Wigan, Blackpool and Barnsley) but the top flight and the major cups have always been and always will be (mad Sheikh's and Oligarch's aside) absolutely dominated by the same 6 or 8 clubs who have always done so (Liverpool, Man Utd, Arsenal, Everton, Villa, Spurs, Chelsea, City) - same in Europe. Want your Champions League winner? Perm any one from Milan, Madrid, Barca, Bayern or Man Utd.
Sky SAVED football. Does anyone remember exactly how sh1te the overall state of the game was in the 70's and 80's. Facilities in stadiums were outdated at best, lethal at worst. Pitches were akin to ploughed fields, the football played on them, for the most part, just as agricultural. Attendances were at a post war nadir and going further downhill and no-one was interested. Clubs were able to change and to implement the findings of the Taylor report due to the money invested by Sky.
It's all very well being misty eyed and nostalgic for the days of the terraces but don't confuse banter with mates on trains and in pubs up and down the country to the absolute b0llocks served up in the top flight stadiums and how supporters were treated worse than animals. I was there. I remember it. Sky have helped to improve all that by a million per cent.
Plus ca change?
NB - Gray is suing News International for the phone hacking stuff. I'd assume his removal was a pleasant opportunity approved by Rupert.
NB - I do not work for Sky, News International or any of its partners!!!
Comment
-
Originally posted by LOOPYHOOP View PostSky have made it all about money now,hence why so many smaller clubs are struggling.Dyslexic so please don't feel the need to correct my spelling mistakes as I really don't give a **** and before you say use spell checker if it is spelt right / wright but not in context spell check is useless
Comment
-
Originally posted by cross it Dave View PostEnglish clubs won the European Cup how many times before Sky, and how many since?
Since then, even allowing for the fact that a generation of players lost the experience needed of playing top European competition, since the involvement of Sky the wider European profile is still way ahead of any other nation...
Man Utd (ECWC & Champions League winners and finalists)
Leeds (CL semi finalists)
Liverpool (UEFA Cup winners & finalists and CL winners and finalists)
Chelsea (ECWC Winners and CL finalists)
Arsenal (UEFA Cup winners, ECWC winners and CL finalist)
Fulham (UEFA Cup finalists)
Still dominant. The only time England wasn't dominant was during the ban and the immediate aftermath.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Nodge70 View PostBanned from Europe from 1985 - 1992
Since then, even allowing for the fact that a generation of players lost the experience needed of playing top European competition, since the involvement of Sky the wider European profile is still way ahead of any other nation...
Man Utd (ECWC & Champions League winners and finalists)
Leeds (CL semi finalists)
Liverpool (UEFA Cup winners & finalists and CL winners and finalists)
Chelsea (ECWC Winners and CL finalists)
Arsenal (UEFA Cup winners, ECWC winners and CL finalist)
Fulham (UEFA Cup finalists)
Still dominant. The only time England wasn't dominant was during the ban and the immediate aftermath.
Comment
-
So the likes of Terry & Rooney would have chosen careers in window clearing or similar instead of earning a paltry 10 grand a week from football, yeah.Last edited by cross it Dave; 26-01-2011, 01:19 PM.I have supported Rangers for 55 seasons, since March 1969.
Comment
Comment