If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I understand that Pete, and yes I am genuinely concerned.
If Neil is happy with players being recommended to him, even if he doesnt ask, then so am I.
I dont care that it is Ledesma, he wasnt the worst player I have seen, what I do care is that if Neil is getting p issed off, but keeping stoomp, it may all come to a head.
Real shame that fans are trying to creat a negative tension ( I know you are genuinely concerned), but the reality is
JONES AND WARNOCK make all the decisions
I agree.
Managers employ scouts to watch players because managers can't manage the team and watch all and sundry play week in week out. If NW trusts his scouts then he'll given them a trial.
Why is S.hittu not a Warnock type player? He has tried to buy Rowlands and Helgusson before even by his own admission, unless you want the whole of the Crystal Place or Sheffield United team. Really not into people trying to fiond things that are not there.
1) Warnock has NOT gone to the board and asked them if he can trial and offer a contract if all good to a player called Ledesma.
Ledesma has been offered to him.. I have no reason why this would have happened.
Why even give our best manager ever the slightest reason to be ****ed off?
All I want is for Neil, Mick and Keith to do the job.
Paladini stay well clear and do what youre good at.
We all agree Ledesma wasnt reccommended by Neil, so this is my point!!
Honest, genuine question - what is Palladini good at which actually benefits our club.
As long as NW and only NW has final say on the players we actually sign I've no problem handing trials to numerous players. If NW thinks that Ledesma, Sh*ttu et al are good enough then great. But if he doesn't and they aren't signed then also great BUT if he doesn't want a player and then it's forced on him then and only then should there be a concern.
Comment