Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

QPR take extraordinary step to end defender's injury problems

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by rangersroar View Post
    So, reading between the lines, you're not keen on him then ?
    No

    Comment


    • #17
      The position we are in IMO warrants every player on our books to be available. If the club is not in a position to reinforce we should call back all the loans inc Vine and Leigertwood. To get us over the line everyone should be available if needed even if its only for 20 mins in one game. Saying that Clarke should be let go!
      22nd February away v Charlton is the 40th Anniversary of my support of QPR and my first game. Away v Chelsea 3-3 23rd Feb 1974. 40 years of pure magic!!

      Comment


      • #18
        Anyone who thinks Hall is even vaguely worth keeping around needs to take another look at Leeds' second goal against us the other week. Absolute joke defending.

        Comment


        • #19
          I'm a fan two , ive always said if fit i would have Hall along side Connolly, but he is very injury prone.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Rsonist View Post
            Anyone who thinks Hall is even vaguely worth keeping around needs to take another look at Leeds' second goal against us the other week. Absolute joke defending.
            Where was our right back in that second goal, remembering he run unopposed from the half way line ??

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Dale View Post
              Let Cook, Hall and Rowlands go

              Always going to be ongoing injury issues

              Throw in Clarke to go too
              I agree with Clarke,pure shite but other 3 will be needed now that our owners refuse to give NW any funds

              Comment

              Working...
              X