Did QBP really supprt Chelsea 6 years ago?

[MYU]

So what if you were a Chelsea fan 6 days or 6 years ago... all that matters is that you are QPR today right, so what's the big deal?

[qblockpete]

it is a ****ing big deal!!

To have your support questioned is the lowest of the low.

[Captain Clunge]

it is a ****ing big deal!!

To have your support questioned is the lowest of the low.

Like "do foreign fans have a right to comment"??????

Double standards Pete

[qblockpete]

Yep, I love the way you twist it.

Still say you cannot comment on certain things, but people like you will take it out of context.

[superckat]

Yeah but he does have a point. Not really taking it out of context. You can't complain about your support being questioned when you complain about people abroad having comments.

For example, you have consistently stated that anyone who only gets information from the internet, cannot really know enough to comment. So that being the case. Can you answer the following question.

Did you have a bet with QPRreport as to who would score the most goals this season. Between Blackstock and Earnshaw. If you did who won I would expect you to have won that bet because there is no way Report could possibly beat you, being that he doesn't attend matches. So who won?

[qblockpete]

Are you having a laugh?

I would always back a QPR player over a Forest player.

I'm sure Blackstock scored most goals, if you count the 2 he got for Forest and compared to how many games he played compared to Earnshaw.

So whats your answer to that?

Tell, me how you can have an impression of an individual if you have not met them?

[superckat]

WHy aam I having a lugh? you made a bet. You lost. Actually I do find it funny considering it shows that Report seems a better judge of player than you. Earnshaw scored 17 goals this season. Blackstock scored 14. The bet was who scored more not who played the most. Although I think you might find that Blackstock played more games. It's not a case of backing one against the other. It's a case of knowledge of a player. Don't understand your question re impression of an individual. I don't know Ronaldo or Ebanks Blake, but I know they were better players than Blackstock and would get more goals. Practically every fan has impressions of players they have seen either live, on TV or even just read about and have never met. People on this board have made impresssions on just watching clips from youtube, or even based on what you have said. Which proves you wrong on so many levels.

[qblockpete]

Earnshaw played 30 league games and scored 11 league goals

How many league games did Blackstock start to score the same?

Please don't tell me because Qpr-report has a little side bet on Earnshaw that he knows about the syle we play and who is a better striker

Its a bit like your defence of Sousa, I asked you how many of those games you saw.. You didn't answer me. I would imagine the ones that physically saw those games have a different opinion from those that just post on a messageboard. It doesn't make you any less of a supporter, your just giving an opinion based on what you read and not what you saw.

If it suits a certain agenda, even better.

[sirpiechucker]

2008/09 League Records:
Dexter Blackstock
Total Matches: 42
Starting: 34
As Sub: 8
Total League Minutes: 2842
Total League Goals: 13 (1 goal every 219 minutes)

Robert Earnshaw
Total Matches: 32
Starting: 19
As Sub: 13
Total League Minutes: 2275
Total League Goals: 12 (1 goal every 190 minutes)

[qblockpete]

Okay, that stat alone proves I am wrong.

Not sure Blackstock started 34 league games for QPR:boss:

It still has not got anything to do with the header of this thread

[sirpiechucker]

Sorry it doesn't copy and paste particularly well. The number on the far left is the Match number (i.e. QPR's 1st, 2nd, 3rd match and so on). Followed by the fixture, scoreline and how many minutes he played for.

Sp. Match Results - - - - - - - - -
1 Queens Park Rangers - FC Barnsley 2 : 1 90 Report
2 Sheffield United - Queens Park Rangers 3 : 0 90 Report
3 Queens Park Rangers - Doncaster Rovers 2 : 0 1 90 Report
4 Bristol City - Queens Park Rangers 1 : 1 1 90 90 Report
5 Queens Park Rangers - FC Southampton 4 : 1 2 90 Report
6 Norwich City - Queens Park Rangers 0 : 1 69 77 77 Report
7 Coventry City - Queens Park Rangers 1 : 0 77 77 Report
8 Queens Park Rangers - Derby County 0 : 2 90 Report
9 Queens Park Rangers - FC Blackpool 1 : 1 1 90 Report
10 Birmingham City - Queens Park Rangers 1 : 0 90 Report
11 Queens Park Rangers - Nottingham Forest 2 : 1 17 90 Report
12 Swansea City FC - Queens Park Rangers 0 : 0 90 Report
13 FC Reading - Queens Park Rangers 0 : 0 60 30 Report
14 Queens Park Rangers - Birmingham City 1 : 0 68 68 Report
15 Ipswich Town - Queens Park Rangers 2 : 0 57 33 Report
16 Queens Park Rangers - Cardiff City 1 : 0 90 Report
17 Queens Park Rangers - FC Burnley 1 : 2 1 90 Report
18 FC Watford - Queens Park Rangers 3 : 0 61 61 Report
19 Queens Park Rangers - Charlton Athletic 2 : 1 2 90 Report
20 Crystal Palace - Queens Park Rangers 0 : 0 56 56 Report
21 Queens Park Rangers - Wolverhampton Wanderers 1 : 0 27 27 Report
23 Plymouth Argyle - Queens Park Rangers 1 : 1 77 13 Report
24 Queens Park Rangers - Preston North End 3 : 2 1 80 10 Report
25 Charlton Athletic - Queens Park Rangers 2 : 2 1 90 Report
26 Queens Park Rangers - FC Watford 0 : 0 46 44 Report
27 Queens Park Rangers - Coventry City 1 : 1 1 90 Report
29 FC Blackpool - Queens Park Rangers 0 : 3 75 15 Report
30 Queens Park Rangers - FC Reading 0 : 0 86 4 Report
32 Nottingham Forest - Queens Park Rangers 2 : 2 59 31 Report
33 Cardiff City - Queens Park Rangers 0 : 0 89 1 Report
34 Queens Park Rangers - Ipswich Town 1 : 3 67 23 Report
35 FC Barnsley - Queens Park Rangers 2 : 1 90 Report
36 Queens Park Rangers - Norwich City 0 : 1 90 Report
37 Queens Park Rangers - Sheffield United 0 : 0 90 Report
38 Doncaster Rovers - Queens Park Rangers 2 : 0 90 Report
39 FC Southampton - Queens Park Rangers 0 : 0 90 Report
41 FC Barnsley - Nottingham Forest 1 : 1 90 Report
42 Nottingham Forest - Bristol City 3 : 2 1 1 90 90 Report
43 Sheffield United - Nottingham Forest 0 : 0 57 57 Report
44 Nottingham Forest - Coventry City 1 : 0 1 90 Report
45 FC Blackpool - Nottingham Forest 1 : 1 1 90 Report
46 Nottingham Forest - FC Southampton 3 : 1 46 46 Report

[superckat]

Earnshaw played 30 league games and scored 11 league goals

How many league games did Blackstock start to score the same?

Please don't tell me because Qpr-report has a little side bet on Earnshaw that he knows about the syle we play and who is a better striker

Its a bit like your defence of Sousa, I asked you how many of those games you saw.. You didn't answer me. I would imagine the ones that physically saw those games have a different opinion from those that just post on a messageboard. It doesn't make you any less of a supporter, your just giving an opinion based on what you read and not what you saw.

If it suits a certain agenda, even better.

Now Pete you know the stats on this. So I'm surprised you are even going there. You know that Earnshaw and Blackstock both started 26 games. If you add sub appearnces to that then Blackstock actually played 3 games more.

I will tell you exactly that QPR report although not being here, does seem to know a hell of what is going on and is a better judge of a striker than you. Especially when you consider that Forest have been struggling against relegation for a good part of the season and we were in the top half all season. It really does shoot your comments down in flames. You lost the bet to him and you know it. Don't you?. C'mon let's see you admit, that Report is the better man

I'm not going to answer your question re Sousa for the following reasons:
1. You very rarely answer questions set to you. So you are in no position to criticise others for not doing it

2. I don't believe it matters whether I was there or not for me to have an opinion on whether Sousa should have been given more chance or not

3. As you have posted your self approx 90% of posters on here have said that Sousa should have been given more chance. So whether I go to matches or not means that nearly 90% of the people who voted on that poll agreed with me and disagreed with you. Are you saying that you know more than everyone else.

The stats and opinion on this board and every other site has proved you very wrong almost to the point of showing that you don't know what you're talking about. They actually seem to agree in the main with people who might not got to games, or as many games as you do.

Surely even you have to admit now that you are wrong.

There seems to be slight confusion over stats. Either way it shows that Blackstock palyed more than Earnshaw.

[superckat]

Okay, that stat alone proves I am wrong.

Not sure Blackstock started 34 league games for QPR:boss:

It still has not got anything to do with the header of this thread

Your skill really is in evasion. You cheeky...

[qblockpete]

Proves my point.

You give an opinion on Sousa, despite not seeing ONE game.

I guarantee the fans I speak to that went to Doncaster, Barnsley etc, felt exactly the same way I did.

Be a man and grow a pair of balls. You don't have to agree with everything qpr-report writes.

[superckat]

Proves my point.

You give an opinion on Sousa, despite not seeing ONE game.

I guarantee the fans I speak to that went to Doncaster, Barnsley etc, felt exactly the same way I did.

Be a man and grow a pair of balls. You don't have to agree with everything qpr-report writes.

Oh dear... lol. It does amuse me how someone who claims to have so many contacts can be so clueless and wrong on so many levels. Still I'll take your advice on board. So to return the compliment here's some advice for you.

Sometimes it's better to be silent and appear the fool, rather than open your mouth and remove all doubt.