Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Land deals/Chelsea/BBC/Earls Court/Unigate/Groundsharing

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Land deals/Chelsea/BBC/Earls Court/Unigate/Groundsharing

    There have been several rumours of land deals going through in and around W12, and suggestions of possible groundshare etc

    a) Does anyone have anything concrete they can share?
    or
    b) Is anyone in a position to confirm something is going on, although they are currently not able to furnish us with the details?

  • #2
    Major concerns with the little elf being our major shareholder.

    I think he would like some kind of worrying link with the sc um.

    If we play at the same ground he can pretend he got the wrong dates because he's old when deep down he just wants to watch the chesc um.
    I played sunday league football today.

    Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

    I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

    We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

    Comment


    • #3
      Bernie's gone for a land grab...

      Comment


      • #4
        Chelsea definitely discussing Earls Court

        Comment


        • #5
          it won't make them west london will it?

          Comment


          • #6
            In a world where we all like to moan about the cost of tickets etc, I think it makes total commercial sense for two clubs to share a NEW stadium. If that means sharing with Chelsea then so be it.

            It is stupid to try and build a new stadium on our own, particularly if it has no other use other than for a football match every other week.

            I must stress, i would not support a move to Stamford Bridge but open to the idea of a share of a brand new stadium.

            We need to be a sustainable business. If we get into the Premiership, I hope that we can stay there for a long time. Get the books balanced and move forward.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by conners View Post
              In a world where we all like to moan about the cost of tickets etc, I think it makes total commercial sense for two clubs to share a NEW stadium. If that means sharing with Chelsea then so be it.

              It is stupid to try and build a new stadium on our own, particularly if it has no other use other than for a football match every other week.

              I must stress, i would not support a move to Stamford Bridge but open to the idea of a share of a brand new stadium.

              We need to be a sustainable business. If we get into the Premiership, I hope that we can stay there for a long time. Get the books balanced and move forward.



              Chelsea need at least a sixty thousand capacity ground, now our support would look lost i'm afraid terrible idea.
              They seek him here.................

              Comment


              • #8
                having seen the new Brighton stadium on saturday night feel that would be perfect for us with its 22,500 capacity and an option to expand my only reservation about the new style stadia is that they seem quite souless - but that could be a result of people no longer sitting next to folk they've shared banter etc with for years - which is the problem that has beset LR of late

                Comment


                • #9
                  if we bought the beeb site, would we let chelsea or fulham share with us?

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Scarlet pimple View Post
                    Chelsea need at least a sixty thousand capacity ground, now our support would look lost i'm afraid terrible idea.
                    Why? They can't fill the current 42,000 and they are at the very peak of the popularity. Their fanbase will not grow any more than it is now.

                    I'm with conners on this re: groundshare - nettle has to be grasped in this country at some point.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      yawn.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        I'd have no probs with a groundshare, fans can't have everything and its a sensible pooling of resources. Only stipulation for me would be that a new ground had stands close into the pitch so it retained the intimidating atmosphere of Loftus Rd and then wouldn't appear so soul-less.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          so bored with all this ground move, ground share, ground zero bullocks.
                          go to the bush, watch the league leaders, watch the best team in the division and go to the pub or home.
                          its that easy. ill even be a **** who talks like adverts and say 'simples'

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by Nodge70 View Post
                            Why? They can't fill the current 42,000 and they are at the very peak of the popularity. Their fanbase will not grow any more than it is now.

                            I'm with conners on this re: groundshare - nettle has to be grasped in this country at some point.

                            Then why would chelsea want to move.????
                            They seek him here.................

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              While it would make some sense to groudshare; I'd hate it. Theres something special about owning your 'own' ground. I'd rather stay at LR than share a ground with Fulham or Chelsea
                              Now, Then, Forever
                              [CENTER]QPR-Football League CHAMPIONS

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X