If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
No problem really, if Faurlin is out, Buzz will play and if Mackie is out, Smith will have a go. Losing Faurlin and Mackie is rough luck, but having Buzz and Smith to step in, softens the blow.
If Faurlin was fit, would he step straight back into the team at Buzz's expense, as Buzz done OK at Leicester by all accounts and was part of a winning team and NW does not like to change winning teams.
Need to play your best players in there best positions and that means Faurlin back in if hes fit. For me none of the front players deserve to be dropped so until injuries or loss of form Buzsaky will have to settle for the bench.
If Faurlin was fit, would he step straight back into the team at Buzz's expense, as Buzz done OK at Leicester by all accounts and was part of a winning team and NW does not like to change winning teams.
IMO he would/will come straight back in as Buzz is not as well suited to the particular role as Ali. Buzz is a good stand in but is far more suited to a more attacking/advanced role. Whilst Buzz did ok at Leicester, we lost the midfield battle, in the main due to the fact that we did not have Ali there breaking things up with Derry. Doncaster keep possession for fun (far better than Leicester) and we will need to see more energy from Buzz in this role on Saturday or else we may be a bit frustrated.
nothing to do with not rating him,if we did not play taarabt;i would play him every game.we can't afford to play 2 ball players in todays game,it weakens the defensive capabilities of the team
nothing to do with not rating him,if we did not play taarabt;i would play him every game.we can't afford to play 2 ball players in todays game,it weakens the defensive capabilities of the team
Comment