Ambrose deal still possible + 2-3 others

[James1979]

Not worried at all, just wish the whole saga would come to an end!

True but don't believe everything the owners tells you!

[Sprocket]

Not worried at all, just wish the whole saga would come to an end!

No interest in Ambrose - suspect will stay with Palace. Would "Love IT" if he joined just to make sure you never come back here. Go away you annoying little boy

[sirpiechucker]

Not worried at all, just wish the whole saga would come to an end!

Me too.

Ambrose is a good player there is no disputing that and he is IMO better than Ephraim so would improve the team but whether he stays with you or joins us I no longer care because the whole saga is dull. If we were trying to sign Lionel Messi then that's one thing but Darren "I've had one decent season in my whole career" Ambrose well I'm over it.

[Magic]

True but don't believe everything the owners tells you!

Champs League in 4 years, we learned the hard way

[paulmason]

If we are talking about a 3 year deal and the figures mentioned are true, he would get an extra £468,000 by playing for QPR FC. Why would he stay at CPFC ?

[singingranger]

dont you know by now! because they are a massive club with massive support and a massive history with a massive future

[Eagle]

that thing about the millions is BS.. we aint spending 2m on any player so we will only get players in who are value for money. 750k for ambrose would represent that should we ever get him.

alot of managers do this in order to disrupt the player and get him to commit one way or the other. he maybe in negotiations with palace but he hasnt signed. no doubt our offer is clearly still on the table. so he is prolly deciding which offer to take.

imo tho ambrose wont hit form he had last year. im confident in that regardless what shirt he is wearing. i'd much rather we went for macnuff as he is twice the player.

my personally feeling is ambrose is 50/50 and it could go either way. personally id rather palace kept him because this has dragged on FAR too long! id rather we got in players who showed a clear desire to play for us.

Having seen McAnuff and Ambrose play many games for us, I can conclude that while McAnuff can beat a man better than Ambrose, Darren does everything else better.

[Eagle]

If we are talking about a 3 year deal and the figures mentioned are true, he would get an extra £468,000 by playing for QPR FC. Why would he stay at CPFC ?

Because he prefers it here.

Also, the type of football we're playing is far better for career development.

Also, if you get promoted (very unlikely), he'll be one of the players who aren't regularly playing.

It's a risk for any player to join. All that you really offer is money. You say you have ambition, but only because you've got money.

[James1979]

Because he prefers it here.

Also, the type of football we're playing is far better for career development.

Also, if you get promoted (very unlikely), he'll be one of the players who aren't regularly playing.

It's a risk for any player to join. All that you really offer is money. You say you have ambition, but only because you've got money.

type of football? crystal palace...the new barcelona!

what on earth are you going on about with your last point? How else does a club show ambition? If you've got no money, you can't sign anyone? Are there clubs with no money that show loads of ambition? How do they do that? Get all the crowd to hold "we're an ambitious club" banners?

[sirpiechucker]

Because he prefers it here.

Also, the type of football we're playing is far better for career development.

Also, if you get promoted (very unlikely), he'll be one of the players who aren't regularly playing.

It's a risk for any player to join. All that you really offer is money. You say you have ambition, but only because you've got money.

Let me gets this right (and I don't want to get involved in a war of words as it doesn't interest me to do so) you are saying that Burley who has yet to manage a proper match for you will play the type of football that is better for his career development. How do you know this? How do you what football Burley will play - surely it's far too early to say just from a few pre season matches. After all if he doesn't have the right players at his disposal he'll have to play the football that those players can play. As I earlier said in this thread under Warnock, Ambrose scored 12 in 34 matches (1 in 2.888) whereas under Hart he scored 3 in 12 (1 in 4) so how can being managed by Warnock again be bad for his career development? With Faurlin and Buzsaky in the side we have two of the most natural footballers in the division to play alongside.

[Eagle]

Let me gets this right (and I don't want to get involved in a war of words as it doesn't interest me to do so) you are saying that Burley who has yet to manage a proper match for you will play the type of football that is better for his career development. How do you know this? How do you what football Burley will play - surely it's far too early to say just from a few pre season matches. After all if he doesn't have the right players at his disposal he'll have to play the football that those players can play. As I earlier said in this thread under Warnock, Ambrose scored 12 in 34 matches (1 in 2.888) whereas under Hart he scored 3 in 12 (1 in 4) so how can being managed by Warnock again be bad for his career development? With Faurlin and Buzsaky in the side we have two of the most natural footballers in the division to play alongside.

1. At every side he manages, Burley plays passing and attacking football. The signs so far have proved that we are going to be keeping the ball on the deck.

Ambrose looked far more threatening from open play under Hart. Also, towards the end of the season, he was getting more and more tired.

[Eagle]

type of football? crystal palace...the new barcelona!

what on earth are you going on about with your last point? How else does a club show ambition? If you've got no money, you can't sign anyone? Are there clubs with no money that show loads of ambition? How do they do that? Get all the crowd to hold "we're an ambitious club" banners?

I didn't suggest that we were the new Barcelona. Only that we are going to be playing good passing football.

Blackpool were skint, but they were very ambitious.

You're definitely not skint, you're just not spending ANYTHING!