Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

What Would You Prefer?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • What Would You Prefer?

    Just wondered

    I ask, because if he doesn;'t have financial clout we have very little chance of getting promoted anyway
    21
    An Owner Who Doesn't Support The Club/With Money
    57.14%
    12
    An Owner Who Does Support The Club/Without Financial Clout
    42.86%
    9
    ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
    THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

  • #2
    What are you on about?

    Just wondered.
    Your mum would love me...

    Comment


    • #3
      It's a no-brainer, isn't it?

      Comment


      • #4
        Ridiculous. We'd all want the one with the money. What good is having a chairman with no cash? You can't sign players, nor afford the wages.
        Your mum would love me...

        Comment


        • #5
          cant wait for HMRC to own us
          Chelmsford City the home of Radio

          Comment


          • #6
            Great shout to the three that want the man with no money.

            How about myself, Hammersmith and Isleworth takeover?

            We are Rangers through and through, so who cares when Warnock, Buzz, Faurlin, Connolly, Cook, Rowlands etc., all leave as we can't afford them. It'll be superb to see how you lot all sing our names when we go into liquidation...Well, we're proper Rangers fans, aren't we?

            Instead of bringing in Clarke, Derry and Hill who many have moaned about, we'll be asking Marc Bircham, Chris Day and Kevin Gallen to come back, because like us, they're Rangers. They'll hopefully work for free as well, because they're Rangers. I reckon we could even talk Marcus Bignott to become player coach and even get Bob Malcolm to be the gaffer.
            Your mum would love me...

            Comment


            • #7
              It doesn't say 'owners with no money', it says 'owners with no financial clout'. Different things.

              Comment


              • #8
                should of made this a public viewing poll so we could see who the retards are.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Sarfend are signing all the out of contract lg and non lg players they can get so youd have competition
                  Chelmsford City the home of Radio

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Stupid question Pete, as shown by Benny.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by BennyBoyRs View Post
                      Great shout to the three that want the man with no money.

                      How about myself, Hammersmith and Isleworth takeover?

                      We are Rangers through and through, so who cares when Warnock, Buzz, Faurlin, Connolly, Cook, Rowlands etc., all leave as we can't afford them. It'll be superb to see how you lot all sing our names when we go into liquidation...Well, we're proper Rangers fans, aren't we?

                      Instead of bringing in Clarke, Derry and Hill who many have moaned about, we'll be asking Marc Bircham, Chris Day and Kevin Gallen to come back, because like us, they're Rangers. They'll hopefully work for free as well, because they're Rangers. I reckon we could even talk Marcus Bignott to become player coach and even get Bob Malcolm to be the gaffer.

                      I think your being rather silly Benny.

                      He was talking about a rangers fan that was rich but doesn't have the billions that the Mittals have.

                      Come on mate play the game.

                      I went with a wealthy rangers fans.
                      I played sunday league football today.

                      Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

                      I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

                      We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Pete explain how much "without financial clout" means they will have? If its paladini pauper amounts then I may as well be incharge.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          An Owner Who Doesn't Support The Club/With Money
                          An Owner Who Does Support The Club/Without Financial Clout

                          Not fans
                          I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            All owners must have financial clout just to own a club, it's just a matter of how much "clout".

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              less money and more passion

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X