Originally posted by WeAreQPR12
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Upping the Bid Never at QPR?
Collapse
X
-
-
Just a question for you guys, if your ready to spend circa £2 million on Jobi McAnuff do you not think it would be better spent on Darren Ambrose whou would far outweigh the number of goals and assists that Jobi would get?
I don't understand why Warnock is prepared to pay that amount for McAnuff yet no more than £750,000 for Ambrose, he was clearly trying to rip Palace off!
Comment
-
Originally posted by PalaceDave View PostJust a question for you guys, if your ready to spend circa £2 million on Jobi McAnuff do you not think it would be better spent on Darren Ambrose whou would far outweigh the number of goals and assists that Jobi would get?
I don't understand why Warnock is prepared to pay that amount for McAnuff yet no more than £750,000 for Ambrose, he was clearly trying to rip Palace off!
Comment
-
Originally posted by PalaceDave View PostHence the reason the new owners pulled the plug on the deal because they knew the club was going to be ripped off by Warnock.#standuptocancer
#inyourfacecancer
Comment
-
Originally posted by PalaceDave View PostHence the reason the new owners pulled the plug on the deal because they knew the club was going to be ripped off by Warnock.
Your fans have been given far too much time on this Board already, time to focus on your own season now.
Maybe we can interest you in some strikers, we've Vine, Ageymang and Helguson all available at rock bottom prices, tell us what give us Ambrose and you can Hall as well.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PalaceDave View PostHence the reason the new owners pulled the plug on the deal because they knew the club was going to be ripped off by Warnock.
Comment
-
i would rather we didnt spend 2 million on mcanuff if im totally honest.
seriously would prefer ambrose, mcanuffs a good player but i would prefer a goalscoring hardworker, and if we get taraabt, cant see why we really need him with mackie in the side as well.
keep that 2 million, spend one of it on ambrose and put the other mill into the striker pot would be the ideal scenario for me.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dazzer1977 View PostTrying to rip you off. Get real fella. He's had one good season in a long time. Don't get me wrong I quite like the fella but I doubt he'll score 15 this season let alone 20 goals. He has 1 year remaining on his contract so £750k is a bloody good deal. Some supporters do live in cloud coo koo land!
Madness to pay £1m or over for him, especially for a club in Palace's financial state, theres hardly a huge queue of clubs lining up to sign him. There's a reason for that.
Comment
-
As I said yesterday Forest offered around £500k in January for Ambrose. He has 7 months less on his current deal now. £750k is a fair sum, if anything Palace are trying to rip us off as paying in excess of 1 million for a one season wonder, with less than one year left on his current deal would be a Man City esque signing. I agree with the above posts Buzz, Faurlin proved their technical superiority over gay boy ambrose at selhurst park in may.15 years in the wilderness will be a distant memory come Sunday 8th May 2011.
Comment
-
Originally posted by PalaceDave View PostHence the reason the new owners pulled the plug on the deal because they knew the club was going to be ripped off by Warnock.15 years in the wilderness will be a distant memory come Sunday 8th May 2011.
Comment
Comment