Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

If Agyemang and Helguson.....

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    another rubbish wind up post imo.
    vine, agyeman and helguson will never wear a rangers shirt in first team action again. certain of that.

    Comment


    • #17
      Seems like we've built an old side to avoid relegation rather than challange top 2. I hope your right Paul as I am a little concerned unless of course we can get some quality in.

      Comment


      • #18
        Don't be so sure GTP. Those 3 must be on at least 30k between them with still years left on your contract (vine is rumoured to be one of the highest earners at 15k +). We wont be able to pay it off because it will cost a fortune and nobody will buy them with the wages they are on. Warnock has said that we have to sell before we can buy, so if we cant get rid of these then we may be forced to see them in a rangers shirt

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by paulmason View Post
          Jeffro, I agree with your sentiments but I don't think there will be any waddling next season, (pictures prove that) as I think the players will be fitter than they have been for a long time and will play to a system or they wont play at all.
          Which means we will probably have a reserve team costing us somewhere in the region of 100k a week

          Comment


          • #20
            we will just cut our losses and ship them all out and pay half the wages with the clubs who take them i reckon

            Comment


            • #21
              W12, Warnock has cancelled the reserve team.

              Comment


              • #22
                Helguson could still do a job for us under NW,probably the best striker we have at this time.I know Agyemang will probably be fit and lean after the summer,like Clarke,but does the same apply to him ,ie he will suddenly be decent,i dont think so.Keep HH,get rid of PA

                Comment


                • #23
                  F*** Helguson, he wants to be at watford and everyone seems to have forgot how poor he was before he left.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    i agree hoop, hes ####ing watford and he is shite.
                    i cant stand helguson more than any other player we have had in ages, and ive detested a few.
                    if he is on our team i wont ever enjoy going.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by G.T.P View Post
                      we will just cut our losses and ship them all out and pay half the wages with the clubs who take them i reckon
                      Which I agree could happen and if it does how can fans expect us to make major outlays on transfer fees then when the club is still paying out substantial funds for players who are not on our books any more.

                      Thanks Gianni

                      Originally posted by W12Hoop View Post
                      W12, Warnock has cancelled the reserve team.
                      Cheers forgot about that, but it actually makes the situation worse because some of these players will be picking their healthy wage packets without even kicking a football in competitive action for months.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by W12_Ranger View Post
                        Which means we will probably have a reserve team costing us somewhere in the region of 100k a week
                        Nope, I would assume if they were not up for the fight, they will be got rid off but if no one will take them because of the lottery contracts they were given, yep we would have an expensive bench, but that's life.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by W12_Ranger View Post
                          Which means we will probably have a reserve team costing us somewhere in the region of 100k a week
                          I forgot to add that that would not be NW's fault, would it.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Originally posted by paulmason View Post
                            Nope, I would assume if they were not up for the fight, they will be got rid off but if no one will take them because of the lottery contracts they were given, yep we would have an expensive bench, but that's life.
                            Well and expensive bench who would also be incapable of making an impact and changing a game as we have already seen up until now.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by W12_Ranger View Post
                              Seriously Benny who will meet this flash w@nk@s wage demands, we are lumbered unless a miracle happens. Too pay up his contract would cost the same as getting someone like Hooper or Boyd in on a transfer fee.
                              I see what you're saying mate, but regardless, he'll not get match time. Sure, it'll still be costing us, but he's simply not good enough for NW to play.
                              Your mum would love me...

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by W12_Ranger View Post
                                Well and expensive bench who would also be incapable of making an impact and changing a game as we have already seen up until now.
                                As I said, that would not be NW's fault if they have players no one wants because they have lottery contracts, so what do they do with them ?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X