bad decision in hindsight.......wouldnt have won us the wc but dafoe off heskey on ffs!
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
walcott .........
Collapse
X
-
Countless reasons why we were poor
Clueless
Talentless
Rooney mania
Lamps and Gerrard in same team
Gerrard on the left
Johnson not an international
Defensively pish poor
No width
No passion
Hype
Unfit players
Gutless
Wealthy players who couldn't give a damn
Naive
Heskey on for Defoe
Wright Phillips on
Pish poor
Positives
Great fans
Many will end their international careers
Me
Surprisingly OK, easier to take when you are sh!te and not so easy when you know you were the better side (Italia 90 and Euro 96)I blew a lot on vodka and tonic, gambling and fags. Looking back, I think I overdid it on the tonic. - The one and only Stanley Bowles
Comment
-
Sorry Facto, absolut tosh.
Walcott couldn't win us a corner, let alone a game.
Like Bent, he had chances (plural) to prove his worth, but failed dismally.
Never beat his man, never delivered a cross.
Johnson or Young a much better shout.
Like Heskey, If he can't a get a regular start for his club, why should England select him ?
Forget the peripherals, our main men were found wanting for 4 games, 70 mins.
Rooney, Lampard, Gerrard, Terry are our spine and none of them can take any credit over the last 3 weeks.
Comment
-
Originally posted by acricketer View PostWe were leaking goals when Defoe was on. We were much tighter when Heskey came on.
Comment
-
What is Walcott actually good at?
He is insanely quick but has NO end product, NO crossing ability.
SWP was a mistake as well.
The biggest mistake was not taking ADAM JOHNSON. Why not include a player that has been keeping SWP out of a City side whilst not even playing in the position he grew up playing????
Comment
Comment