Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Does 4 Years Mean 4 Years?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Does 4 Years Mean 4 Years?

    I always thought it was 3 because the last year you need to sell the player, otherwise he ends up going for a free?
    ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
    THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

  • #2
    doesn't really matter....4 years is too long.

    Comment


    • #3
      Wow...here comes another 3-4 pages of...sigh
      Your mum would love me...

      Comment


      • #4
        4 years is too long should of learn't from past mistakes, and we're off!
        I played sunday league football today.

        Clearly I was the best player on the pitch.

        I scored 5 and made 7 last ditch tackles.

        We lost 5-0 but the rest of my team were sh it!

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by WeAreQPR12 View Post
          4 years is too long should of learn't from past mistakes, and we're off!
          it has it merits sometimes...!!, we are yet to see though..

          Comment


          • #6
            I bet you wish we had Fualrin on a 4 year deal?

            Guess the same people would be saying to long before he signed?

            End of the day you don't give players 1 or 2 year deals, they simply won't come. Good decision by Warnock
            ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
            THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

            Comment


            • #7
              thats assuming you can sell them. if not you have to pay them for the duration of the contract. so yes four years means four years

              Comment


              • #8
                only good if he turns out to be good otherwise your stuck with another dud...we need to give the fella a decent chance before we see what nw has in store for us
                PRIDE OF LONDON.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
                  I bet you wish we had Fualrin on a 4 year deal?

                  Guess the same people would be saying to long before he signed?

                  End of the day you don't give players 1 or 2 year deals, they simply won't come. Good decision by Warnock
                  The club "allege" they have spent £3.5 million on Faurlin and give him a 3 year deal but then give a 4 year deal to the likes of mackie and Angymang,where is the logic in that.If we are going to give 3 year deals to one player,give it to every player(unless they are 30 or over).

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Ask Dave if a 4 year deal really means a 4 year deal as he seems to be laughing at the moment.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by matthew View Post
                      The club "allege" they have spent £3.5 million on Faurlin and give him a 3 year deal but then give a 4 year deal to the likes of mackie and Angymang,where is the logic in that.If we are going to give 3 year deals to one player,give it to every player(unless they are 30 or over).
                      To be fair, I think we shouldn't be comparing Mackie to Agye at the moment. Ok, they may have similar goal-scoring records but let's give him a chance, and we'll see what happens!
                      We're Queens Park Rangers, we rule supreme

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        with good behaviour you're out in two.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Yes 4 years means 4 years otherwise it would called something like 3 years!!!


                          FFS you tell the likes of Hall, Cook or Ageymang their ridiculously long contracts doesn't mean what they signed on the dotted line for.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            4 years is 4 years. We have to pay the player for the 4 years. To argue otherwise is illogical. It's only in the last 6 months of your deal can you negotiate with clubs outside of your FA's jurisdiction for a Bosman transfer. All other times, fees are payable, though of course as with your car, depreciation sets in as the clock winds down on the deal.

                            That said, 4 years is far too long for a player of Mackie's ability, age and sell on value. IMO

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Matthew I notice you have Ambrose as your picture,are you confident we've got him?

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X