Its just GP again and his very strange long contract to players who have been very average in the past
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Mackin - a 4 year contract?
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by Youvebeenrangered View PostYour... just, ah theres no point...
I understand quite a few are saying this as a wind up, but some of them truely believe it. Ridiculous.
As I said before...Do you think NW is the type of manager to allow this? Nor do I.Your mum would love me...
Comment
-
maybe hes on a 4 year contract but on 2 grand a week. none of u lot no nething unless your the board. i love my football club but we have got the most negative fans. it becomes a bore to see the same old faces writing the same old muck about palidini.. dont like it go and support palace or preston or pourtsmouth. u dont pay the wages or put money in the club so what the problem???
Comment
-
Originally posted by BennyBoyRs View PostThe really sad thing about it is that 'if' we sign Hooper, Cox, Watson, Shittu etc., on 4 year deals, GP won't have had anything to do with it. But anything these fans see as negative...well...Gianni's fault, of course.
I understand quite a few are saying this as a wind up, but some of them truely believe it. Ridiculous.
As I said before...Do you think NW is the type of manager to allow this? Nor do I.
I literally cant be arsed to debate this with some people because its a complete waste of time...Cant believe it, ive been PWOPER MUGGED ORF...
Comment
-
Originally posted by Youvebeenrangered View PostAgree with you totally, exactly my thoughts mate.
I literally cant be arsed to debate this with some people because its a complete waste of time...Your mum would love me...
Comment
-
would newcastle or west brom of signed him or been a better team with him in it this season?
he dont look good enough to be in a automatic promotion winning side to me.
but gotta trust in the manager tho, got to.
(sorry wrong mackie thread)
Comment
-
Originally posted by HammersmithR View PostI hope this is not Agymang all over again. Signing a striker who has scored 7 goals in his previous season from a struggling team. He plays well for the first few games and then we're stuck with him for the next 4 years!
Comment
-
Originally posted by Youvebeenrangered View PostFFS!!! This pisses me off, no offence hammersmith but none of us really know much about the kid.
Ok im with everyone else on the agyemang and fitz hall front, but give the lad a chance, that 4 year contract may be valuable if he hits some good form and has bigger teams sniffing around.
Clearly Warnock is confident in his ability and knows he could go on to bigger and better things, hence the leverage of a long contract should he hit that form and should those bigger clubs come in for him..
Finally this isnt a old boy looking for a last pay day, this contract covers what you would hope to be his best years in football.
Some things never change, even with a clean sheet at the club.
A 4 year contract makes sense if you want young players to buy into a long term development of a club. not only that it protects the club from vultures if we make good signings. As mentioned by Youvebeenrangered.
C'mon give it a chance lads.The future's bright...the future is blue and white.
:grimace:
Comment
-
Originally posted by hoopsa1987 View Postmaybe hes on a 4 year contract but on 2 grand a week. none of u lot no nething unless your the board. i love my football club but we have got the most negative fans. it becomes a bore to see the same old faces writing the same old muck about palidini.. dont like it go and support palace or preston or pourtsmouth. u dont pay the wages or put money in the club so what the problem???We Are The People.....
Comment
Comment