do we want to be palace mk2?

[themodfather]

let's end this talk of signing numerous palace players..they didn't beat us once this season and could go down.

yes we need new legs and faces but not a wholesale raid of sodding palace.

i don#t want to see us as palaces mk2....do you?

[Rebel R's]

NO,and if NW loves Palace as much as he claims to do he wont want to break up their team

[qpr-buzsaky]

No, nick clyne and speroni. Thats it. We are Qpr

[Rebel R's]

And NOT Hill or Danns,but Clyne or Speroni would be good

[qpr-buzsaky]

100% not hill, don't want or need him. Borrowdale is better

[qpr_matt]

let's end this talk of signing numerous palace players..they didn't beat us once this season and could go down.

yes we need new legs and faces but not a wholesale raid of sodding palace.

i don#t want to see us as palaces mk2....do you?

Leave it out. They would have been going for promotion. Take there best players yes, if you think we are bettter than them then you do not watch football.



In areas we are better, but they would be better off if they didnt lose points, so you do the math.

[80sCasual]

Leave it out. They would have been going for promotion. Take there best players yes, if you think we are bettter than them then you do not watch football.



In areas we are better, but they would be better off if they didnt lose points, so you do the math.

Ok so they were deducted 10 points and before they would have been going for the play offs but after the deduction us and them were in near the same positions, if not better for them. In the latter part of the season we proved we can get out of it and are on for a mid table finish, whereas they weren't good enough and are where they are for a reason.
No excuses after the deduction.

[kingo]

Ok so they were deducted 10 points and before they would have been going for the play offs but after the deduction us and them were in near the same positions, if not better for them. In the latter part of the season we proved we can get out of it and are on for a mid table finish, whereas they weren't good enough and are where they are for a reason.
No excuses after the deduction.

Probably something to do with NW, so perhaps we should leave it to him to pick the players he thinks can do the best job for QPR. I am old enough to remember Venners doing a similar thing and I didn't question his judgement then either.

[m_cooper]

without the points deduction they would probably be top 6,that would have had a very negative effect on the team.look at the facts;they are the 3rd best team as far as defeats go;only newcastle and west brom have fewer defeats FACT

[Shania]

I give up! Where were PALACE before the deduction? JEEZ

[michael67]

10 point deduction and finished the season managed by Hart. Any clues there why they are where they are?

[James1979]

If warnock feels these are the type of players needed, then that's fine by me. The bad run we went on shows that there is something clearly missing from our squad. Other than faurlin, can we really praise any for putting their hand up during this bad run? Let's stand by warnock's decisions and not criticise, let's give hin at least 2 seasons to build his team.