Paladini

[The Merry Ploughboy]

and of course they would divulge important club information to the "club drummer" wouldnt they.Dream on chap

[qblockpete]

o dear.

Not confidential confirmation saying that someone will be in their job for at least a couple of years when he already is at the club, after it being speculated that someone is going.

You can dream on all you wish, those are the facts.

As I say, time will tell because if I am wrong you can open a bottle of champers. You forget its a big issue to you, but not to people who run the club.

[qblockpete]

If your theory is correct, he will be gone on Sunday or in the summer at the very least. Lets just wait to the start of the season and come back to the subject.

Really no point in this ?

You'll saying he is going

I'm saying he isn't.

July/August we will know who got it right.

No real point in discussing until then

[The Merry Ploughboy]

Are you telling me what i can and can not discuss?
You have a patronising style of posting that makes it difficult to;
a)have any type of rational sensible debate
b)respect anything you post
c) smirk when many others pull your ramblings to pieces
I put it to you, that you know as much as the next man in regards to Uncle Gis length of time left at our club,pure speculation on both sides,similar to your never ending wild forecasts you used to post.What is it 0/27??

[MYU]

I thought it was MYU's site, that Pete contributed to?

Anyhow, another sad day in WATRB history. Why not just ban everyone who isnt "on message"?

Just seen this post.

Myself & Pete own this site, we pay for everything and discuss which changes or updates we want plus everything else that needs sorting.

We started this site from scratch and have since then upgraded everything and own every part of the site now, it's taken time but we do it so we QPR fans have something different on the Internet.

We want debate but as long as there is no abuse at another, we want this to be place for all fans fans weather you like someone or not, but to allow everyone a say.

We all have to be careful how we word things on the Internet because sometimes it comes out all wrong and people can get upset.

We are a fans website that listen to what fans want however we are unable to please everyone but everyones ideas is good, let us know if we can improve in anyway.

One of the main aspects of this site is that we have had fans input into making this site better and have involoved fans when and where we can, give it the feel of a fans website.

Our next aim is to bring in advertising to help the running costs, or something that can help reduce the costs but we will keep working hard to reach our goals, any upgrades/updates are on hold for the time being.

The board room is there for everyone to use, it takes time for everyone to get used to the sections but it will work, C Palace site has many sections but the site has been going for about 10 years to our one year on this forum.

[michael67]

Just seen this post.

Myself & Pete own this site, we pay for everything and discuss which changes or updates we want plus everything else that needs sorting.

Sorry to bring this up, but Pete in this same thread said something different.

Originally posted by Pete.
It is not Myu's site, its actually owned by me. Myu and I pay equal amounts each month to run it and to be honest without him this site would not be in existence, because I have no techincally ability at all, he puts a load of work into this site

So who is right here?

[qblockpete]

I own it, but class Myu has a joint partner because of all the work he does.

We share the monthly cost

No real problem with that..........

[michael67]

I haven't got a problem with who owns the site. It could be Donald Duck for all I care. It's just when you say one thing and MYU says different, I don't know who to believe. And if I don't know who to believe who says who owns this site, how can I take your word that Gianni is going to be with us for another season at least.

[brightonr]

Nice post Brighton and a pleasure to debate sensibly with you.
For me personally,the list of wrongs he has done at the club far far outweighs any good he has done.If he is not empowered with decision making,he seems a very expensive"front man" and not a good one as he is dispised by sections of the support.He hasnt good links with other clubs who dont like his style.
My final point is this;in your own company/buisness/line of work if someone performs to an unacceptable level do they get rewarded with a "title" and less responsibility?

A pleasure to debate sensibly with you also.

For the record, I have no great allegiance to one side or the other. I would perhaps lean towards the pro side if any, for two reasons.The first being that many of the reasons given why people do not want him are based upon hearsay, without any evidence to substantiate it, despite the man himself offering to go straight away if any proof of his misdemeanours should be forthcoming.

The second, which you may find to be strange reasoning, is that a good proportion of those who are not in favour of him being at the club, seem to put across their views (or jump on those of others), in such a blatantly unfair way with absolutely no regard to the constraints with which he was under (and I accept that it was he that put himself into that position), so as to detract from any reasonability that their views may hold. If I were to direct nothing but abuse at you, constantly criticise your actions without taking into account why you may have taken them in the first place, along with not being able to put forward a genuine alternative in a civil manner, I would not expect too much sympathy from others.

You may well be right in taking the view that he has caused more harm than he has done good and are entitled to any opinion that you have formed. All I am trying to say (in a long winded way !), is that if people were to argue their views without the need to resort to abuse, making snide comments about each other etc., then this would be a much more united place to be.

Finally, (at last, but in my opinion every bit as important), I have an enormous amount of respect and gratitude for the work that Pete and MYU have and continue to put into this site, along with all the moderators who I can only assume must be sick to death of dealing with the unnecessary infighting going on. I genuinely fail to understand why some people constantly make snide comments towards them for no apparent reason other than their opinion of one man, may happen to be different from their own.

I have seen posts using the phrases "lapgog", "puppet" etc., to name just a couple. I have seen them accused of trying to cause debate to get "hits" on this site. Why would they? I have seen them accused of being nothing other than "Paladini's mouthpiece". I have seen unfounded accusations that they do this for financial gain. What I have never once seen, is evidence of these.

I find it perfectly acceptable that you or anybody else may have different views to either of them on any subject, but I would just like to see those differences discussed without the need for nasty comments or threats. Perhaps I'm just old fashioned, but I live in hope.

[ChelmsfordRs]

A pleasure to debate sensibly with you also.

For the record, I have no great allegiance to one side or the other. I would perhaps lean towards the pro side if any, for two reasons.The first being that many of the reasons given why people do not want him are based upon hearsay, without any evidence to substantiate it, despite the man himself offering to go straight away if any proof of his misdemeanours should be forthcoming.

The second, which you may find to be strange reasoning, is that a good proportion of those who are not in favour of him being at the club, seem to put across their views (or jump on those of others), in such a blatantly unfair way with absolutely no regard to the constraints with which he was under (and I accept that it was he that put himself into that position), so as to detract from any reasonability that their views may hold. If I were to direct nothing but abuse at you, constantly criticise your actions without taking into account why you may have taken them in the first place, along with not being able to put forward a genuine alternative in a civil manner, I would not expect too much sympathy from others.

You may well be right in taking the view that he has caused more harm than he has done good and are entitled to any opinion that you have formed. All I am trying to say (in a long winded way !), is that if people were to argue their views without the need to resort to abuse, making snide comments about each other etc., then this would be a much more united place to be.

Finally, (at last, but in my opinion every bit as important), I have an enormous amount of respect and gratitude for the work that Pete and MYU have and continue to put into this site, along with all the moderators who I can only assume must be sick to death of dealing with the unnecessary infighting going on. I genuinely fail to understand why some people constantly make snide comments towards them for no apparent reason other than their opinion of one man, may happen to be different from their own.

I have seen posts using the phrases "lapgog", "puppet" etc., to name just a couple. I have seen them accused of trying to cause debate to get "hits" on this site. Why would they? I have seen them accused of being nothing other than "Paladini's mouthpiece". I have seen unfounded accusations that they do this for financial gain. What I have never once seen, is evidence of these.

I find it perfectly acceptable that you or anybody else may have different views to either of them on any subject, but I would just like to see those differences discussed without the need for nasty comments or threats. Perhaps I'm just old fashioned, but I live in hope.

Great post Brighton couldn't have put it better myself

[Captain Clunge]

I own it, but class Myu has a joint partner because of all the work he does.

We share the monthly cost

No real problem with that..........

Just out of interest, what does it cost to run the site? Roughly, and out of genuine interest.

[qblockpete]

this one?

Due to streaming videos and this type of site just under £100 a month

[Captain Clunge]

this one?

Due to streaming videos and this type of site just under £100 a month

Thanks

[MYU]

Thanks

That's without the time we put in to create/update and monitor the site.

[Kirill]

That's without the time we put in to create/update and monitor the site.

I.e. the time us Nazi mods spend power-tripping