Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Faurlin Speaks... Credit to Paladini

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Couldn't give 2 hoots about Paladini. But why is it impossible to believe that faurlin was his signing? Faurlin says that above, good enough for me. Better than this I heard it was gorman, magilton. I don't care about gorman and magilton, they've gone, history.

    Comment


    • #17
      Originally posted by W12_Ranger View Post
      One theory is the lie was told to deflect attention away from his failings as DoF after all Faurlin was our '£3.5 million record signing' so it would not look good if he flopped and he could just blame Gorman. Then Faurlin is a success and Gianni wants to ensure he takes credit for signing him so spouts off to a young starstruck reporter, spins the story on Peteys radio show and gives Petey the heads up last week that Faurlin will quote him as bringing him to the club so Petey does what he is told to do and gloats about it.

      Alternatively Gorman did identify him as some Ipswich fans have suggested on their MB's.

      Either way we have been lied too and at the centre of this lie is guess who, its totally unexceptable IMO.
      Spot on post. That's the way paladini works, and the sooner we get the liar out the better.

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by W12_Ranger View Post
        So basically what you are saying that this quote is totally inconclusive.



        Whether it is Gianni the liar, Petey the liar or the Club lying we have been spun a yarn and it is not exceptbale. I couldn't care less who brought Faurlin to the club he is a great player but some of those with no moral fibre don't seem to think the lies are not a problem as long as they prove their point and are right.

        Rewriting history brings further shame on the club and no doubt Faurlin has been instructed to ensure he makes that quote, totally disgusting and the club should be absolutely ashamed of themselves.
        W12 - what i am basically saying....is i have no idea

        But logic would suggest, that if the official QPR website has suggested that John Gorman first spotted him....you would then assume that John passed this info onto the club, either Jim first and then onto the current "DOF" who deals with transfer fees.

        That's how i would assume things are run.So....on that assumption, you would have to give the initial credit to John Gorman for spotting, because without that, there would have been no negotiations for GP to deal with.

        Im no lover or big fan of GP, but it does seem that he managed that one quite well....but why we need to be told that it's all down to GP is beyond me.

        That said....I do hope we keep the young lad - as he is one postive thing to come from this season.

        Comment


        • #19
          Great to see that SM, the impressionable youngster from The Island, get taken under the wing and is immediately spouting Pete-esque flamers.

          When you've grown up a bit, you'll look back on this era of your life and shudder.
          QBP 20th August 2009..."To be fair, I'm glad we are top of the table (for agents fees). Shows we are not a selling club anymore."

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by Captain Clunge View Post
            Great to see that SM, the impressionable youngster from The Island, get taken under the wing and is immediately spouting Pete-esque flamers.

            When you've grown up a bit, you'll look back on this era of your life and shudder.
            By posting a link?

            Comment


            • #21
              Originally posted by Captain Clunge View Post
              Great to see that SM, the impressionable youngster from The Island, get taken under the wing and is immediately spouting Pete-esque flamers.

              When you've grown up a bit, you'll look back on this era of your life and shudder.

              Comment


              • #22
                Whoops!
                Another thread doesn't go the way admin/mods predicted so it gets buried in the Board Room!

                Pathetic!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by James1979 View Post
                  Couldn't give 2 hoots about Paladini. But why is it impossible to believe that faurlin was his signing? Faurlin says that above, good enough for me. Better than this I heard it was gorman, magilton. I don't care about gorman and magilton, they've gone, history.
                  Well Faurlin is hardly likely to praise any of the former management team is he? Especially when it is being reported by certain peoples favourite mouthpiece MR Warburton (Love his bread, hate his reporting....)

                  As has been said by others the point is for those of us that have morals that we were lied to by the club, employees of the club and some fellow fans. Is that alright with you? If so good luck to you mate, some of us have a problem with being lied to.....
                  A message to the other Premier League clubs when they visit Loftus Road.....

                  "NUESTRA GLORIA, VUESTRO INFIERNO"

                  (If you don't understand it, then learn Spanish. It is the language of world football.....)

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Originally posted by James1979 View Post
                    Couldn't give 2 hoots about Paladini. But why is it impossible to believe that faurlin was his signing? Faurlin says that above, good enough for me. Better than this I heard it was gorman, magilton. I don't care about gorman and magilton, they've gone, history.
                    Its not impossible to believe he was a Palaidni signing, its unacceptable that we have been lied to if the case and how the trurth is coming out.

                    Do think that is acceptable?

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      I admit I'm completely out of touch with this boardroom stuff. What did he lie about? I'm not trying to create an argument here btw, just need some background to the animosity

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Originally posted by James1979 View Post
                        I admit I'm completely out of touch with this boardroom stuff. What did he lie about? I'm not trying to create an argument here btw, just need some background to the animosity
                        When we signed Faurlin the Offy in 3 separate articles claimed Faurlin was spotted by Gorman. Now GP has taken it upon himself to take all the credit and is effectively rewriting history using his cronies as per usual.

                        Totally unprofessional and totally unacceptable.

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          5 minutes longer than I expected but whoosh..........

                          Still - there'll be others....

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Ok, fine. Not sure it explicitly says "Paladini should take sole credit for this" but I take your point, it is a bit inconsistent.

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by W12_Ranger View Post
                              When we signed Faurlin the Offy in 3 separate articles claimed Faurlin was spotted by Gorman. Now GP has taken it upon himself to take all the credit and is effectively rewriting history using his cronies as per usual.

                              Totally unprofessional and totally unacceptable.
                              Spot on.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Originally posted by Paladinooo View Post
                                Whoops!
                                Another thread doesn't go the way admin/mods predicted so it gets buried in the Board Room!

                                Pathetic!
                                Yes, it's scandalous that a post about boardroom issues (ie GP) gets moved to the Boardroom section of the forum. What sort of way is that to run a website ?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X