Tosic

[enzian]

Same applies to Bent,why bother bringing him in if we're not going to play him.Signing him prevented us from bringing in another loanee striker who could have made the difference in the last few games.

it's just indicative of the way our club has been run.i think we've a d.o.f. that's totally incompetant or he only serves his interests.why have seven or eight loans on the books when you can only have five in the squad?.

[Quaz]

it's just indicative of the way our club has been run.i think we've a d.o.f. that's totally incompetant or he only serves his interests.why have seven or eight loans on the books when you can only have five in the squad?.

thought that title was gone...catch up.

[qblockpete]

enzian.

You miss something rather important.

Since Warnock came in, he has total control on the players that come in.

Saying that you cannot legislate for Beattie not coming at the last minute

[enzian]

[QUOTE=Quaz;323336]thought that title was gone...catch up.[/QUOTE]

i'm up to speed,perhaps yourself and qbp should wake up.the only new face since nw is "tosic",seems to be some doubt as to wether he's a loan or short term contract.if you go a little bit further back to where qbp was questioning the signing of tosic he stated that "he could have been signed by gp or nw".

[qpr20]

Errr where the hell was he today?

Why bother bringing him on loan when we aren't even going to use him but instead use the useless Matt Hilll

Answers please.

i think it's cos he played a full 90 mins in the reserves on wednesday

[80sCasual]

i think it's cos he played a full 90 mins in the reserves on wednesday

Oh of course, much more important.

[Jamie]

Tosic is only contracted to Pompey until the end of the season and cannot join them permanantly whilst in admin so we've got him in on loan to have a look at him with a view to signing him this summer....

It's essentially a trial whereby he can play in the first team