7 current loans ?

[QPR1976]

According to NW in today's papers (The Sun for one)

correct me if I'm wrong, I think 6
Ikeme, Hill, Taarabt, Simpson, Priskin & Bent.
Quashie was signed on short term contract after being released by WHU.

So, can someone point this out to NW.
If fit, no reason why Bent can't be selected tomorrow if Jay not fit.
Or Priskin deemed not worthy. (Even The Sun rated him 4 and worse player on the pitch V Swans. So we're not in the minority Pete !)

[BennyBoyRs]

The title of this thread looks suspiciously rude...

[QPR1976]

Sorry, should read 'current'

[Ginger Ninja]

bent should be on the team sheet before priskin every time.

[QPR1976]

Agreed, so I wonder why he's not.

Is he injured ? No one knows.
Certainly fit for NW's first game as it was widely reported he had to explain the loan situation to the Manager, to his loss.

If not injured, why did he not feature, at least, on the bench Saturday.
With Simpson out, there was a place for him and surely he's not behind Vine, Cook, Balanta, German, Oastler & Brown (?) in order of outfield players !!!!!
And that's without the Priskin debate.

Unless off course there's something we don't know ?

[AgsQPR]

Course theres something we don't know, everyone can see that Priskin is woeful. Neil Warnock is no mug and I cannot imagine he is happy with Priskins effort or lack of it on the pitch. Thats what gets me more than anything is his laziness and inability to work for the team.

[rickqpr]

Quashie is not on loan he has signed with us perm till end of season

[QPR1976]

Thats what I thought Rick and mentioned in the inItial thread.
My point is why does NW think we have 7 loans and why doesn't someone correct him so Bent gets considered ?