12 against 10

[rtone]

well i suppose you can only count us as 9 while we persist with priskin. don't know which was more painfull, cpmplete biased ref, or a ****ing useless **** with no heart, no pace and no ability playing forward in a hooped shirt. still, the "banter" was fun

[qpr]

I feel so low at the moment, its a joke

I was going to post we did well for 9 players, priskin is the worst "pro" i have ever seen,
He beats everyone QPR have ever had bad

[rtone]

there is a little to cheer about, the **** lost

[bushcelt1]

kind of makes up for it knowing even with all their dough they will never win the c.l

[qblockpete]

Unfair on Priskin, who had a good game.

Though the ref was the worst I have seen for a long time.

[AgsQPR]

Unfair on Priskin, who had a good game.

Though the ref was the worst I have seen for a long time.

Priskin had a good game? Not sure we watched the same player. He was uninterested, slow, lazy, half hearedly jumped on occasion to lose headers. It must be part of the deal that he has to play x amount of games because no other way should he be on that pitch ahead of Buz, German or even Bent!

[Blonkie]

Unfair on Priskin, who had a good game.

Though the ref was the worst I have seen for a long time.

Sorry Pete - but can you explain exactly what Priskin did last night ?! How can you say he had a good game ?!

Won one header all game - and spent most of the 2nd half wandering aimlessly around in midfield as we dropped deeper and deeper.

Not to put too fine a point on it - imho Priskin is the least talented "striker" to pull on the hoops since ...... Marc Nygaard ...... Devon White ...... etc. etc.

When we did eventually bring on German he won his first three headers and showed a bit of application and energy.

I for one would be very disappointed with Warnock if he starts with Priskin again on Saturday - he must give German a chance to stake a claim for his place.

Surely we are now just building for an assault next season - God help us if Priskin is part of Warnock's plan for next year !!

[qblockpete]

The poor fella only has to touch the ball, and we have a go.

Putting it into presepective, he was poor at Sheffield United, but yesterday he did alot of things right, including in the second half with 10 men, he created our best chance. He is not a right winger in the mould of Routledge, but guess Warnock is not having him play for that reason.

Guessing we would all like to see our fans favourite Buzsacky start or Cook on the left, with Hogan right, but Warnock is playing Priskin for a reason. I assume its to protect the midfield, having too many flair players in the starting 11 might be why we had been conceding, just a thought.

Can I just add this is not only my judgement, but arguing about Priskin's selection or him being kept on for 90 minutes, is also arguing with Warnock's tactics. He is the one playing him and keeping him on.

[AgsQPR]

Unless Priskin has to play a certain amount of games as part of the deal and Warnocks getting them all out the way so we have a good run in. George Santos is a better option than Priskin imo

[paulmason]

I wonder if he has a clause in his contract which says if he is fit he plays as there is no other reason to continue playing him ahead of Buzz.

[qprjim]

I wonder if he has a clause in his contract which says if he is fit he plays as there is no other reason to continue playing him ahead of Buzz.

There must be something in his contract to state this, as its plain for all to see that he doesnt merit a starting place, admittedly he wasn't as bad as he has been in recent matches, but he was still poor. What makes it all the while more frustrating is German did more in his cameo than banana boots did during the whole 90. So there must be something stating he has to play or else im sure NW would be blooding the youth

[paulmason]

There must be something in his contract to state this, as its plain for all to see that he doesnt merit a starting place, admittedly he wasn't as bad as he has been in recent matches, but he was still poor. What makes it all the while more frustrating is German did more in his cameo than banana boots did during the whole 90. So there must be something stating he has to play or else im sure NW would be blooding the youth

If so, NW does not have 100% control of who plays then does he ?

[Goddard]

If so, NW does not have 100% control of who plays then does he ?

If there is a "deal", which I doubt very much, then it was signed and done before Warnock arrived.

Nothing he could do to change signed contracts, even if he wanted to.


I think too much is being made of this unchanged team Warnock has been picking. It's common practice to pick the same side if they perform well.

Although not at QPR lately, before Warnock rolled up.

[Bluehoop]

If so, NW does not have 100% control of who plays then does he ?

Warnock would not be here if he did not have 100% autonomy - so that puts to bed this pile of turd rumour and your chance to moan on about you know who.

[qpr_rich]

He's hardly our best player, but he didn't do that much wrong last night. He did truly wind me up by being offside from a freekick and then backing in very obviously into matt mills around the 70 minute mark, what a waste of much needed posession. But talk about him being the worst player to ever pull on the shirt... are you sure??? I can quite easily name 30 players who have done worse than him during the last 5 years or so... lets be proud of the team that referee was a total joke who couldn't wait to send off and penalise a Neil Warnock player and if I ever meet him I'll throttle him.