Would banning The Stirrers Benefit this Board??

[MYU]

But why would you want to, why even mention the mans name, no one asked about him.

We wanted to hear about the meeting, you spend an hour writing a report, lose it on your PC and put a brief one back up, yet make sure you have that quote in.

You know full well its going to get a reaction, why are you trying to to cause unrest on the MB tonight, why keep suggesting your going to ban posters???

It seems you struggle with debate and don't like being challenged yet seem to want to lay into the likes of me and TB at every opportunity at the moment.

Last week you made a number of accusations against me an Terry Ball and was actually proved wrong. Prior to this you start a thread after the West Brom match slating a few of us, yet we were ecstatic with the result, this was out of order as well. I offer an olive branch last week to you yet you are trying to find a reason to ban us even though your own Moderators have publicly stated that they don't agree with you. I'm not trying to play the victim here but I must admit it's certainly starting to feel like it.

In future we should expect others not to bring his name in it for no reason.

The thread was about the meeting, many of you do not like Gianni and never will even if the facts are in front of you.

I think Pete is right to mention it because it's important to let the fans who keep going on about Gianni to now give it a rest, because his good enough for Amit & the board then his good enough for our club.

It should have ended there and why make such a big deal about it, it's from Amit's mouth and Pete has proof if you want it?

Now if it was the other way round and they said a slightly nasty thing about Gianni, we would still be talking about it now and there would have been 50 threads started and we would never here the end of it.

Amit said what he did, it was in the meeting and now we should move on.

[Bluehoop]

In future we should expect others not to bring his name in it for no reason.

The thread was about the meeting, many of you do not like Gianni and never will even if the facts are in front of you.

I think Pete is right to mention it because it's important to let the fans who keep going on about Gianni to now give it a rest, because his good enough for Amit & the board then his good enough for our club.

It should have ended there and why make such a big deal about it, it's from Amit's mouth and Pete has proof if you want it?

Now if it was the other way round and they said a slightly nasty thing about Gianni, we would still be talking about it now and there would have been 50 threads started and we would never here the end of it.

Amit said what he did, it was in the meeting and now we should move on.

[ChelmsfordRs]

Maybe weeks and weeks and hundreds of posts about how GP will be next out and how he is the crooked little man that no one trusts gave rise to this specific comment being highlighted - maybe in the hope that it would put an end to the pointless mass of threads on the subject - but sadly no, all it did was bring the usual suspects out of the woodwork to have another snipe and IT HAS GOT REALLY BORING NOW SO WHY NOT CHANGE THE RECORD FFS because what you are posting is not an opinion on a topic of debate so much as a poisonus wart on the end of your noses that you just can't help keep picking everytime it scabs over.

Yes that's the way I saw it, you cant blame Pete for highlighting that point from the meeting. If it had been the other way round and they had said they had concerns about GP's actions then over at Reports site it would have been shouted from the rooftops in a giant smug filled w*nkfest.

The anti GP guys are clearly upset with the news that it looks like GP is here to stay despite all the rumours and a sustained online campaign to oust him.

I'm still very much of the opinion that I'm happy to go with what ever decision Amit/Ishan make regard GP and trust their opinion much more than Mikey and his keyboard warriors.

[Receed R]

Yes that's the way I saw it, you cant blame Pete for highlighting that point from the meeting. If it had been the other way round and they had said they had concerns about GP's actions then over at Reports site it would have been shouted from the rooftops in a giant smug filled w*nkfest.

The anti GP guys are clearly upset with the news that it looks like GP is here to stay despite all the rumours and a sustained online campaign to oust him.

I'm still very much of the opinion that I'm happy to go with what ever decision Amit/Ishan make regard GP and trust their opinion much more than Mikey and his keyboard warriors.

well said

[Paladinooo]

Pete's the biggest stirrer on this site, and that's a big fat fact!

[qblockpete]

Done nothing to stir things, just relayed what was said.

Sorry.

As for being big and fat, wouldn't argue with that

[ChelmsfordRs]

As for being big and fat, wouldn't argue with that

[Spencer]

Pete - why do you just not ban W12 ranger and terry ball.It seems quite obvious that Bluehoop HA9 and Chelmsford to name just 3 - quite clearly do not like these two posters, they don't like the fact that these two fans have issue's with Gianni Paldini, in fact do not like anyone who has anything negative to say about the man.

If i'm being really honest - i thought it was an off the cuff remark to make about GP - but decided not to pick up on that.

You have said to me on a few times that you are not pro Gianni but clearly you defend his corner....which is your human right of course.

If you want to get rid of these debates, as they will continue, then i suggest,politely, that you ban every single poster on here(me included i'm afraid) who in fact has issue's with Gianni.That way - the issue of Gianni and his position at the club will never be an issue.You will lose some posters granted, but at least it will stop offending the likes of Ha9 Bluehoop chelmsford etc..who quite clearly are tired of posters such as Terry W12.

I'm not picking on thesthree in general - just that they were the last 3 to make noises.

Think the time has come to put your footdown and decide what you want from your message board.

[ChelmsfordRs]

Pete - why do you just not ban W12 ranger and terry ball.It seems quite obvious that Bluehoop HA9 and Chelmsford to name just 3 - quite clearly do not like these two posters, they don't like the fact that these two fans have issue's with Gianni Paldini, in fact do not like anyone who has anything negative to say about the man.

I have no problem with W12 or Terry B and certainly do not want them banned, in fact I prefer them to a lot of the posters on here as they are actually willing to join in the debates on the whole GP issue. I have spoken to them both via PM in the last few weeks and have full respect for their views.

Just to make it clear yet again - I AM NOT PRO GP - I am Pro Amit/Ishan and will support them in their appointments. I will however call BS and hypocrisy where I (believe I) see it and some of the attacks on Pete on this thread fell into that category.

[Spencer]

I have no problem with W12 or Terry B and certainly do not want them banned, in fact I prefer them to a lot of the posters on here as they are actually willing to join in the debates on the whole GP issue. I have spoken to them both via PM in the last few weeks and have full respect for their views.

Just to make it clear yet again - I AM NOT PRO GP - I am Pro Amit/Ishan and will support them in their appointments. I will however call BS and hypocrisy where I (believe I) see it and some of the attacks on Pete on this thread fell into that category.

On that i am in total agreement.

If they feel that GP is doing a good job for the club and can change his PR,you would,I assume,have to back their judgement on their appointments.GP being one of them .

I mentioned on a thread By W12chris about his involvment re - helping BFC...which is good PR....but many fans still are very suspiscous of the man and posters like Terry and W12 ranger appear to be bringing that to this board.This does seem to annoy a few people.We either accept it and debate it - or lose it.

I'm in agreement with you - it's a debatable subject , which is however going to make peoples emotions run high.Again - nothing wrong with that.

[qblockpete]

Spencer, have no problem talking about that subject matter if a thread is started.

Do I have problem wth relaying what Amit and Ishan said and that being turned into a political football, which the Conservatives and Labour would be proud of..yes.

Trouble is, many threads are simply hijacked.

[Paladinooo]

Spencer, have no problem talking about that subject matter if a thread is started.

Do I have problem wth relaying what Amit and Ishan said and that being turned into a political football, which the Conservatives and Labour would be proud of..yes.

Trouble is, many threads are simply hijacked.

Name names or stop bleating pete, you're getting tiresome now.

[wicksta]

This board would be totally out of balance without people like W12 and Ball. Pete you are the biggest 'stirrer' from the other end and you know it, if you stifle the polar opposites to yourself then your board is going to be totally lopsided ala QPR Report or Indy Rs.

Remember some of the stirring you have done over the years Pete?

Live web chat with Flavio?
Big news at 16:30?

etc. etc.

You're as 'bad' if not worse than them but it would be a shame to see anyone go as I would think it would alienate people more in the middle such as myself. You need each other.

[Hoopaman]

Another stupid thread that brings everyone together. Good thinking pete. Have you learnt nothing from flavio!!? A dictatorship doesn't work.

If your getting stressed over having disagreements over gp may I suggest having a little break. Go and stay in gianni's villa in Naples for a few days.

[qblockpete]

May I suggest looking at the bigger picture?

Thsi thread is not specific to one area.

We have several QPR messageboards, just if the taste doesn't suit cannot understand being here.