Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Answer me 1 question!

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • qprmarc
    Silver Seat
    • Mar 2009
    • 1942

    #1

    Answer me 1 question!

    Would you rather:

    a) go out playing defensively looking to score the odd goal and getting bored to death and frustrated with the poor quality of football

    or

    b) go out playing to actually win the game, entertain the fans making them feel like they've got value for money.

    I know my answer, i dont want a repeat of this season.
  • THE FLYING COW

    #2
    yes

    quite agree mark worst football in the fifty years of me going to loftus road
    i was brought up on mark lazarous rodney marsh and stan bowles
    thats wasnt qpr last season that was absolute crap
    l would rather lose games four three than watch nil nil boreing rubbish
    lets bring in warnock and have a return to the ian holloway brand of football
    GOALS GOALS AND MORE GOALS

    Comment

    • qprmarc
      Silver Seat
      • Mar 2009
      • 1942

      #3
      i would rather decanio returned dex, the football we played was brilliant and he gets the best out of the players.

      Comment

      • BUSHRANGER1982
        Gold Seat
        • Mar 2009
        • 5666

        #4
        Originally posted by qprmarc
        Would you rather:

        a) go out playing defensively looking to score the odd goal and getting bored to death and frustrated with the poor quality of football

        or

        b) go out playing to actually win the game, entertain the fans making them feel like they've got value for money.

        I know my answer, i dont want a repeat of this season.
        B, for me, qprmarc.
        Of all the names "most likely" to occupy the Loftus Rd hotseat, Luigi Di Canio is the only nailed on certainty to guarantee entertaining football, if not for the entirety of the season, then at least for most of it.
        If I'd only ever wanted to watch sloggers intent only on getting the "right result", I'd be an ARSEnal fan today. ;D

        Comment

        • qblockpete
          C Club
          • Mar 2009
          • 22186

          #5
          Some supporters will not admit it for some reason.

          Why was the QPR V Swansea crowd so bad?

          It came after a series of bad results and dire performances, no-one wants to see that.
          ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
          THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

          Comment

          • BUSHRANGER1982
            Gold Seat
            • Mar 2009
            • 5666

            #6
            Originally posted by qblockpete
            Some supporters will not admit it for some reason.

            Why was the QPR V Swansea crowd so bad?

            It came after a series of bad results and dire performances, no-one wants to see that.
            Could well be true. Swans are an entertaining side to watch, and QPR weren't at that time.

            Comment

            • THE FLYING COW

              #7
              i

              i wouldnt mind buying jason scotland hes a bit of a live wire up front

              Comment

              • MYU
                Administrator
                • Mar 2009
                • 43466

                #8
                B for me & I have said this all along.

                We are not garanteed to win if we play defensively looking to score the odd goal and getting bored to death and frustrated with the poor quality of football.

                Comment

                • Quaz

                  #9
                  b for me....gigi in charge would give more excitement in 10 games than we have had all this season.

                  Comment

                  • superckat
                    Bronze Seat
                    • Mar 2009
                    • 433

                    #10
                    It's a very stupid one sided question. That doesn't even need an answer because you have already provided it. You might as well ask:-

                    Q1. would you rather watch Forest draw 1-1 with Blackpool
                    or
                    Q2. Would you rather see Liverpool draw 4-4 with Arsenal

                    Please respect peoples intelligence on these sites

                    Comment

                    • Quaz

                      #11
                      Originally posted by superckat
                      It's a very stupid one sided question. That doesn't even need an answer because you have already provided it. You might as well ask:-

                      Q1. would you rather watch Forest draw 1-1 with Blackpool
                      or
                      Q2. Would you rather see Liverpool draw 4-4 with Arsenal

                      Please respect peoples intelligence on these sites
                      not really a stupid question if you look over our season.....we have drawn alot of games 0-0....but when we beat southampton 4-1 people still thought we played terrible.......so the question is a valid one.

                      Comment

                      • superckat
                        Bronze Seat
                        • Mar 2009
                        • 433

                        #12
                        When you use phrases such as "bored to death" "defensively" ,"frustrated" and poor quality of football in one question and say "go out playing to actually win the game, entertain the fans making them feel like they've got value for money." in the next. What do you think people are actually going to answer? It's very one sided, worded only to get a required response. It's really not very clever.
                        Last edited by superckat; 25-04-2009, 01:08 PM.

                        Comment

                        • THE FLYING COW

                          #13
                          well

                          intellegeance is not that precous
                          its better to be thick as a plank than to be unhappy
                          simplcity is genious

                          Comment

                          • Quaz

                            #14
                            Originally posted by superckat
                            When you use phrases such as "bored to death" "defensively" ,"frustrated" and poor quality of football in one question and say "go out playing to actually win the game, entertain the fans making them feel like they've got value for money." in the next. What do you think people are actually going to answer? It's very one sided, worded only to get a required response. It's really not very clever.
                            who said it was clever was just saying its a valid question......alot of people have stated that they would prefer boring 1-0 wins and promotion....just because it means promotion......never mind value for money.......

                            Comment

                            • Mutley

                              #15
                              I dont think it is that straight forward.

                              Many 1-0 results worked for Arsenal under George Graham.

                              On the flip side, Keegan had Newcastle playing some of the most exciting football ever. It was this gun-ho approach that cost them the title.

                              Football is attractive when its played correctly. Finding the right players and the right combinations but it takes time. Success however, takes even longer. You dont win nothing leaking goals aplenty so it has to start at the back.
                              (You can see where this is heading.....so i wont continue).

                              Comment

                              Working...