Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 2009 Accounts - a review

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
    qprdad

    Can you please clarify the loss in last 12months, am I reading it right?

    Is it 5 million and some change? Though overall debt is much higher (21 million)

    QPR FC itself made a light profit?

    QPR Holdings made the loss?
    The LOSS for the year was about £19/20 million as I've already posted. The fact that further shares were issued and bought for £15 million means that someone has put that amount in, but it doesn't negate the LOSS. And most of that loss was due to your Italian friend. Still think he does a good job?

    Comment


    • #17
      SPIN

      Nothing to do with friendships !!!!!!!!

      Get it right, caluculate it right and then come back.

      Instead of getting personal, stick to the facts.
      ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
      THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

      Comment


      • #18
        Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
        SPIN

        Nothing to do with friendships !!!!!!!!

        Get it right, caluculate it right and then come back.

        Instead of getting personal, stick to the facts.
        They ARE the facts. Loss of £20 million in ONE YEAR. £15 million ploughed back in to cover 75% of that loss. And that's LAST years figures - this years will be a lot worse.

        Comment


        • #19
          Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
          What kind of things would QPR FC include?

          (not talking holdings)
          Its sales are all management fees made to Holdings, and its costs are player registrations, and the wages of the club.

          But, don't get bogged down with this company, the consolidated Holdings accounts show the true position.

          Comment


          • #20
            Originally posted by jonno View Post
            The LOSS for the year was about £19/20 million as I've already posted. The fact that further shares were issued and bought for £15 million means that someone has put that amount in, but it doesn't negate the LOSS. And most of that loss was due to your Italian friend. Still think he does a good job?
            qprdad you seem to know what you are on about :-) ^^^^^ is this right?
            its actually been run at a £20 million loss until someone lumped an amount in?

            Comment


            • #21
              Dad

              A negative balance sheet = Insolvent doesn't it?

              Comment


              • #22
                Originally posted by vblockranger View Post
                qprdad you seem to know what you are on about :-) ^^^^^ is this right?
                its actually been run at a £20 million loss until someone lumped an amount in?
                The accounts show that we made a £20,928,000 loss for the year to 31.5.09.

                This loss is cast in stone......

                As this loss is being made, certain loans and extra share issues have occured to fund the losses, but the fact remains that the loss was just shy of £21m!

                Lucky we've got rich owners!

                Oh!, and thanks for the complement!

                Comment


                • #23
                  Originally posted by Boo Radley View Post
                  Dad

                  A negative balance sheet = Insolvent doesn't it?
                  That is correct. However, we have not been trading fraudulently as the company can still meet its debts as and when they fall due, because of the support of the owners.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    so guess we are just really lucky that Bernie and Flabio was there to pick up the pieces after that debacle of a year.....£20 million loss!! someone needs to be shot.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Originally posted by vblockranger View Post
                      so guess we are just really lucky that Bernie and Flabio was there to pick up the pieces after that debacle of a year.....£20 million loss!! someone needs to be shot.
                      Yes, but in other respects - was Flabio one of the reasons the loss was so high?

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Thanks QPRDAD, never thought anyone would be able to put it away that i could understand

                        Can I ask what is the point of having two companies a) QPR holding company and b) and QPR FC
                        One for all.... and all for one

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Originally posted by Bigears View Post
                          Thanks QPRDAD, never thought anyone would be able to put it away that i could understand

                          Can I ask what is the point of having two companies a) QPR holding company and b) and QPR FC
                          There can be various reasons, however the most probable one would be that the original company has title to LR etc, and a holding company was the easiest way of raising capital / transferring shares etc.

                          The most commonplace way would be to have all of the assets in a holding company e.g. the gorund, and then have a trading subsidiary which pays rent to the parent. This would then protect the ground etc from adverse trading conditions i.e. the subsidiary can go bust, but you still own your ground etc.

                          The structure seems a little lumpy and messy, but as it's not doing any harm I should imagine that the board didnt see the need to ponce about changing things!

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Thank You
                            One for all.... and all for one

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Originally posted by qprdad View Post
                              The accounts show that we made a £20,928,000 loss for the year to 31.5.09.

                              This loss is cast in stone......

                              As this loss is being made, certain loans and extra share issues have occured to fund the losses, but the fact remains that the loss was just shy of £21m!

                              Lucky we've got rich owners!

                              Oh!, and thanks for the complement!
                              Just like to say thank you for your clarification on this point, I knew we would get there in the end.

                              In lamen terms we lost £20 million for 2008/9 and another £15 million had to be pump into the coffers just to finance this shortfall through a share issue + loans.

                              Everything is ok though the QPR FC accounts made a small profit, so small in infact you'd barely be able to buy a 2 bed flat in Shepherds Bush with it.

                              This just demonstrates the extent Paladini's incompetance at handling transfers and contracts even with Briatores penny pinching as I suspect thats what makes up a large slice of the £20 million figure.

                              Meanwhile QBP is all over the place......
                              Last edited by W12_Ranger; 05-03-2010, 08:23 PM.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Massive thanks qprdad for taking the time to explain all of that..makes a alot more sense.!

                                Cheers
                                Running the London Marathon for the Down's Syndrome Association....


                                Visit my charity page here

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X