Christ Almighty!....

[Goddard]

As it stands.... over 2,000 posts, 102 pages, and 120,000 views on one single thread:

http://forums.cpfc.org/showthread.php?t=197183&page=102

But, they're not bothered about Warnock all of a sudden. And are turning on him, slowly.

[stan_bowles]

The Bristol City/Rovers/new stadium thread on footballforums.net has over 6600 posts in it.

[Mutley]

Thats how its supposed to be.

It would probaly be the same on here, if people didnt keep starting a new thread all the time. Too many egos that consider their posts sooooooo important.

[Dazzer1977]

Thats how its supposed to be.

It would probaly be the same on here, if people didnt keep starting a new thread all the time. Too many egos that consider their posts sooooooo important.

Spot on fella.

[Chalet1882]

yeh how many seperate warnock threads have we got going
moderators are you gonnna do some admin work on here and put them all together for your all importent hits i think it would generate more new user etc

[yugohoop]

We could easily have a bigger thread about GP if people would stop posting new ones.

[EYR]

Thats nothing compared to the De Canio vs Sousa debates

[Easy]

Should be intresting when we visit palace on the 10th April if all is true

[Goddard]

Should be intresting when we visit palace on the 10th April if all is true

Very.

[Chalet1882]

im going to that f*****g game even if i do get splinters in my ####

[wicksta]

I love how they denied it would ever happen at first, even tracking down the poor guy who broke the inside news and outing him in real life. They also had a thread saying QPR fans wanted Warnock with about 200 replies all saying "I bet they do", thinking it was nothing more than a rumour. Now they are singing a completely different song. Numpties.

[W12_Ranger]

Thats how its supposed to be.

It would probaly be the same on here, if people didnt keep starting a new thread all the time. Too many egos that consider their posts sooooooo important.

Spot on mate being saying trhat for a while. Some posters on here are like kids starting the the same threads which have already been posted.

[Goddard]

yeh how many seperate warnock threads have we got going
moderators are you gonnna do some admin work on here and put them all together for your all importent hits i think it would generate more new user etc

A couple have been merged.

But most of the Warnock threads stem from different angles/sources, and develope into seperate debates, and go off in various routes.

I understand what you mean, and those that are similar have been merged... but to merge all threads about Warnock would leave you with a couple of 20 page threads, full of posts saying basically the same thing. Quite confusing to read.


But, point noted.

[Goddard]

I wont start a new thread with this(!)... but there's a point raised by a Palace fan on that forum that hasn't been mentioned on here yet:

.... How on earth can we go to a crucial away game with a manager in whose interest it is for us to lose?

I'm not saying that Warnock would be anything other than 100% committed to getting 3 points for Palace tomorrow, but it is an unusual situation for a manager to be in. His next team would benefit from his current team losing.

I suppose they are at least playing S****horpe, who are also down in the relegation battle. Which makes it less black and white when it comes to the result of that game tomorrow.

[bonkerrrrs]

This thread is still going and crystal Palace fans now quoting our thread on which two players we would like to take from them - all getting a bit hot under the collar over there!!!