Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Deleted thread?! Why censor debate?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    once hes gone what will people have to talk about!!!!

    i want more "future" news not bothered about gp now come on

    #QPRJunglists #QPRPartybusmassive @epn1882chalet QPR - JUNGLE - DnB - Westside Hounslow


    Comment


    • #32
      I'm not on about the loans???? I'm on about how much we have spent as a club???

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Mutley View Post
        Wasnt Neil just banned/warned for trying to delete threads that werent going his way?
        That crossed my mind as well.

        Comment


        • #34
          Thread has not been deleted, its been locked.

          terry ball, you made reference to the bad loans in January
          ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
          THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
            Thread has not been deleted, its been locked.

            terry ball, you made reference to the bad loans in January
            Show we me where i have made reference to the bad loans in jan

            Stop trying to dodge my comment. Do you agree with this post?


            Pete, I agree with you on this, Champions league football was spoke about and a 4 year plan for the premiership. Very disappointing calibre of player arrived at the club and the loans have been a farce apart from maybe 3.

            What I also can see is that although there has been no real outlay on transfer fees (allegedly, as most are undisclosed) as a club we have spent vast ammounts on wages, signing on fees, agents fees, bonuses and paying contracts up.

            So, although the inital outlay for these players may have been zero, they would of still cost the club money.

            Can you see that?

            Comment


            • #36
              Terry, unless you were being sarcastic, I thought you were dismayed about the loans



              so we agree?

              As for money spent in 2 and half years..

              We have sold Blackstock and Routledge

              What money have we exactly wasted? We've had peanuts to spend in the first place?

              Unless, I am wrong (you can correct me), majority fans were disilussioned that Flavio did not spend big, when we were sold the promise of Premiership?champions League.

              As I said, Newcastle, WBA, cardiff have spent more? Cardiff spent how much one player Chopra??

              WE DON'T DISGAREE< WHAT IS THE ISSUE HERE??
              ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
              THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by qblockpete View Post
                Terry, unless you were being sarcastic, I thought you were dismayed about the loans



                so we agree?

                As for money spent in 2 and half years..

                We have sold Blackstock and Routledge

                What money have we exactly wasted? We've had peanuts to spend in the first place?

                Unless, I am wrong (you can correct me), majority fans were disilussioned that Flavio did not spend big, when we were sold the promise of Premiership?champions League.

                As I said, Newcastle, WBA, cardiff have spent more? Cardiff spent how much one player Chopra??

                WE DON'T DISGAREE< WHAT IS THE ISSUE HERE??
                We agree on alot of the above but you seem to be struggling to see we have wasted money on loans, agents fees, bonuses, etc

                Comment


                • #38
                  Money on loans??

                  Call me an idiot, but if you don't have money to buy a player, what can you do?

                  Agent fees?/

                  I saw a league table, where we were 1 place from bottom and another where we were near the top?? diviided by 6 months each over the year. The very fact, we haven't bought anyone will mean again on agents fee when the next table comes out we will be near the bottom?

                  (I can track the agent fee tables if need be, for the last two tables)

                  I say again what are we arguing about?
                  ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                  THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Hell of a lot of loans.Do agents get fees for loan signings?

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      the thread in question was obviously closed because QBP couldn't back up his claims when asked, plain & simple really

                      :cheers:

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        I have reposted the signings in this thread:laughter:
                        ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                        THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          I think the argument from me was what little money we have spent we've spent badly. Money, whether it be on salaries, agent fees or transfer fees on unneccessary signings like Alberti, Tomassi and Reid is money spent badly.

                          Before the takeover we had a few decent players (Rowlands, Camp, Stewart and Blackstock) who would all make an 18 man squad if they were all still at the club meaning that we only needed to improve with 20 signings not 40+. Weaknesses weren't identified early enough and the constant changes in manager have meant an umbalanced squad with each new manager plus Briatore wanting different things. Whether we've spent £1m or £100m we could have spent the money better. Did we need to sign Alberti? With Ainsworth, Cook, Buzsaky, Ephraim and Ledesma the club did we really need to sign another winger?

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by Nodge70 View Post
                            Faurlin has been devalued from a £3.5m transfer to a free???!!!!

                            Wow - that's some depreceation!

                            NB - I think all those loans carry a level of fee. I know that at least two of those loans cost us six figures.
                            Add to this Parejo's salary and I should imagine there was a significant amount spent.

                            Not alot of it particularly well IMO.

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              AGree

                              Parejo, that was ridiculous
                              ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                              THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                sirpiechucker

                                Unbalanced squad. we have Rowlands and Mahon out for the season?

                                Do agree, money available to buy quality was very limited
                                ALL BEST BANTER AND ALL THE LATEST FROM QPR.
                                THE WEST LONDON 90 MINUTE FOOTBALL SHOW EVERY MONDAY FROM 9.30PM http://mixlr.com/the90mfs/

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X