Also In News Of The World..Conveniently Missed

[qblockpete]

"While Harford speaks regularly to Gianni Paladini, back in the role as football club chairman, it will be Inshan Sakesena who makes the ultimate decision about his future"

So while the spin doctors revel in a paper headlines, this puts it properly into prespective.

[qpr]

Sorry if i'm missing something,

Is Gianni Paladini still sporting director ??

[qblockpete]

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo

[sirpiechucker]

I thought the argument was that NOTW didn't have a clue what it was talking about so it doesn't matter what it says because it's all a load of rubbish. You've said yourself that The Sun (which owns the NOTW) isn't to be believed so why should this story be any different.

[qblockpete]

Sirpeichucker, just not liking the spin.

We've got a handful of fans who already feel justified in telling our new majority shareholders what to do and saying nothing has changed. Clearly they have.

[sirpiechucker]

Sirpeichucker, just not liking the spin.

We've got a handful of fans who already feel justified in telling our new majority shareholders what to do and saying nothing has changed. Clearly they have.

I understand you don't like the spin. Neither do I. Until proven otherwise we should be backing the new owners 100%.

The problem is though is that one paper which is notorious for making stuff up and proven for not having a clue about QPR can't then be used to prove a point on a different matter. To me NOTW is a funny read with wild and amazing stories which should be taken with a pinch of salt and not thought as a paper which could be accurate on a different matter.

Time will tell who really is in control. I believe that as a club we will be able to attract good managers without Briatore and if we still can't do that then Friday's events were just spin.

[qblockpete]

You are right, time will tell.

We had the detroit spinners in the eighties and now we have the rangersboys Spinners thats all

[qpr]

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOo

Thanks

[theblackmafia.]

You are right, time will tell.

We had the detroit spinners in the eighties and now we have the rangersboys Spinners thats all

Um, I think you will find it is the QBP spinners

[Fawny]

You are right, time will tell.

We had the detroit spinners in the eighties and now we have the rangersboys Spinners thats all

This radio stuff is going to your head mate, you've gone all Smashy and Nicey

[PeterG]

"We had the detroit spinners in the eighties"

More incorrect information
the detroit spinners were in the 70's by the 80's they were the Detroit Emeralds!

[NewarkR]

If you Googled that, you're sad.

If you didn't, you're REALLY sad.

[qblockpete]

The detroit spinners had a Top ten hit in 1980

In the noughties we have the rangerboyspinners

[Rbee]

All wrong I am afraid. The Detroit Spinners is the UK name for the American group The Spinners. They added the Detroit part over here as we already had a popular folk group over here called The Spinners.

The US Spinners started in the 50's although all their big hits, such as Could It be I'm Falling In Love, were recorded in the 1970's. The Detroit Emeralds are a totally different long gone group, again most popular in the 1970's with hits such as Feel The Need.

No need to Google, not sad just a music fan.

[qblockpete]

I remember

working my way back to you:laughter: sure it was 1980 or 81?

maybe peteg can clarify