I know someone will tell me I rush to conclusions, and that I should wait for some more weeks, but I do not think I draw the wrong conclusions: I was wrong abut Ainsworth. He has won me over!
I was extremely disappointed when we signed Ainsworth. I felt is was the biggest possible mismatch between the type of players we have and the preferred style of the manager. For any small club to succeed longer term, player sales to the Premier League is vital. But a club can only develop players that are suitable for PL if the club plays a brand of football that resembles the PL to a certain degree. No premier league clubs are looking for hoof ball experts.
I felt the period under Ainsworth last season was torture. Most often, I didn't like the football, but more importantly, I felt we were going nowhere. Critchsley had to deal with an injury nightmare we have hardly ever seen before. Player after player returned under Ainsworth, but we never improved. I appreciate graft and hard work, but there must be something in addition. I like a direct style of play and counter attack when the opposition is disorganised. But aimless long balls forwards without a clear plan is dreadful. The season was saved by the away win at Burnley. In my book, this was pure luck. We could have been four down by half time.
This season started in possibly even more dire circumstances. When Watford were 4-0 up after 40 minutes I feared they could score ten.
When Ainsworth announced (before the Cardiff game) that we would change style and tactics, going for a more possession based style, I thought it was the first sign of a desperate manager on his way out. If you have preferred a certain style of play for ten years, and built your identity and competence around it, how should you manage a completely opposite style equally well to other managers than have fine tuned it for years? I thought it would end in tears.
I have now seen four league matches under the reborn Ainsworth. It has produced two wins, but more importantly, it has produced four impressive matches, with an efficient style of play. We are reasonable solid defensively, and we produce many chances. The play is entertaining and with seemingly a clear plan. We are still very direct, we are susceptible to the long balls towards a lonely Armstrong, but there is a style of play that suits our players. With a little bit of luck we could have won all four and been one point off the top of the table.
There are so many things to cheer about:
- Ainsworth seems to get the best our of some under performing players, such as Kakay and Dozzell. They have never been better (we knew from the past that Kakay is better in a back three than as a full back or wing back). Armstrong is like a new player, but his development might also be down to more experience - he is still young (now it is all about getting the best out of Willock and Dykes as well).
-Some of the players Ainsworth has brought in are looking like sterling signings - in particular Cook, Colback and not at least Smyth. Apart from the howler against Southampton, Begovic has also done well and Fox looks a useful signing. I suppose Lerkech is one for the future.
- We have a team with fight and spirit I cannot remembers since the Warnock days with Hill, Derry and Mackie.
- We have more tempo to our game. In Smyth and Armstrong we have a wealth of pace, that gives us many new options.
- We seem better organised defensively than under recent managers.
- We see young players getting a chance. It is too early to say if Kolli and the other young players that have been given a chance will establish themselves in the team, but there are certainly more encouraging signs than I can remember for many years.
I know it is early days, but I think this season will be fine. I don't think we will be in a relegation battle. I am prepared to hear that I am stupid that draw conclusion based on just four matches, but I don't bother. Ainsworth has won me over and I am so glad I was wrong.
I was extremely disappointed when we signed Ainsworth. I felt is was the biggest possible mismatch between the type of players we have and the preferred style of the manager. For any small club to succeed longer term, player sales to the Premier League is vital. But a club can only develop players that are suitable for PL if the club plays a brand of football that resembles the PL to a certain degree. No premier league clubs are looking for hoof ball experts.
I felt the period under Ainsworth last season was torture. Most often, I didn't like the football, but more importantly, I felt we were going nowhere. Critchsley had to deal with an injury nightmare we have hardly ever seen before. Player after player returned under Ainsworth, but we never improved. I appreciate graft and hard work, but there must be something in addition. I like a direct style of play and counter attack when the opposition is disorganised. But aimless long balls forwards without a clear plan is dreadful. The season was saved by the away win at Burnley. In my book, this was pure luck. We could have been four down by half time.
This season started in possibly even more dire circumstances. When Watford were 4-0 up after 40 minutes I feared they could score ten.
When Ainsworth announced (before the Cardiff game) that we would change style and tactics, going for a more possession based style, I thought it was the first sign of a desperate manager on his way out. If you have preferred a certain style of play for ten years, and built your identity and competence around it, how should you manage a completely opposite style equally well to other managers than have fine tuned it for years? I thought it would end in tears.
I have now seen four league matches under the reborn Ainsworth. It has produced two wins, but more importantly, it has produced four impressive matches, with an efficient style of play. We are reasonable solid defensively, and we produce many chances. The play is entertaining and with seemingly a clear plan. We are still very direct, we are susceptible to the long balls towards a lonely Armstrong, but there is a style of play that suits our players. With a little bit of luck we could have won all four and been one point off the top of the table.
There are so many things to cheer about:
- Ainsworth seems to get the best our of some under performing players, such as Kakay and Dozzell. They have never been better (we knew from the past that Kakay is better in a back three than as a full back or wing back). Armstrong is like a new player, but his development might also be down to more experience - he is still young (now it is all about getting the best out of Willock and Dykes as well).
-Some of the players Ainsworth has brought in are looking like sterling signings - in particular Cook, Colback and not at least Smyth. Apart from the howler against Southampton, Begovic has also done well and Fox looks a useful signing. I suppose Lerkech is one for the future.
- We have a team with fight and spirit I cannot remembers since the Warnock days with Hill, Derry and Mackie.
- We have more tempo to our game. In Smyth and Armstrong we have a wealth of pace, that gives us many new options.
- We seem better organised defensively than under recent managers.
- We see young players getting a chance. It is too early to say if Kolli and the other young players that have been given a chance will establish themselves in the team, but there are certainly more encouraging signs than I can remember for many years.
I know it is early days, but I think this season will be fine. I don't think we will be in a relegation battle. I am prepared to hear that I am stupid that draw conclusion based on just four matches, but I don't bother. Ainsworth has won me over and I am so glad I was wrong.
Comment