Give him a game against Blackburn , age doesn't matter he's hardly a kid .
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Sinclair Armstrong
Collapse
X
-
Players at 19/20 should be making 1st team squad.
Armstrong will get better playing and training with 1st Team. I want him to become a fixture on bench at matches, getting some minutes on pitch.
Doubt he'll be 1st choice 1st half of season, maybe towards end of season, he could be.
We'll only find out if we try.
- Likes 2
Comment
-
When we were relegated in 79 something, we were crying for a goalscorer. We had Clive Allen at the time, just 18 or 19 years old and scoring for fun at youth level. We did not risk him, however, when relegation was confirmed he played the last two games and scored five goals! For sure, I remember him scoring three against Coventry!
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Don’t care how old he is or who he has played against. He’s definitely better than any other striker at the club. I’ve only needed to watch him a couple of time, watch highlights & read up on who else have been interested in him in the past. Needs to be playing, we won’t go up or down without him so no risk even if he wasn’t our best striker
- Likes 1
Comment
-
all this hype on this lad is ridiculous! We have had 2 managers now that see the lad for what he is a decent young lad with potential but no where near ready to play championship football! Look at chair and eze loan spells at Stevenage and Wycombe pulled up trees great performances, Sinclair went to national league twice and hardly scored a goal! He has been linked with clubs due to having a decent agent let’s be honest if Man City were genuinely interested you honestly think he would still be playing for our U23s? People hate on dykes he played Wealdstone scored a hat tick showed his level, Sinclair comes in does ok but doesn’t score in same amount of time but is in some way so much better then dykes?
Originally posted by Rich View PostDon’t care how old he is or who he has played against. He’s definitely better than any other striker at the club. I’ve only needed to watch him a couple of time, watch highlights & read up on who else have been interested in him in the past. Needs to be playing, we won’t go up or down without him so no risk even if he wasn’t our best striker
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qpr33 View Postall this hype on this lad is ridiculous! We have had 2 managers now that see the lad for what he is a decent young lad with potential but no where near ready to play championship football! Look at chair and eze loan spells at Stevenage and Wycombe pulled up trees great performances, Sinclair went to national league twice and hardly scored a goal! He has been linked with clubs due to having a decent agent let’s be honest if Man City were genuinely interested you honestly think he would still be playing for our U23s? People hate on dykes he played Wealdstone scored a hat tick showed his level, Sinclair comes in does ok but doesn’t score in same amount of time but is in some way so much better then dykes?
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by Qpr33 View Postall this hype on this lad is ridiculous! We have had 2 managers now that see the lad for what he is a decent young lad with potential but no where near ready to play championship football! Look at chair and eze loan spells at Stevenage and Wycombe pulled up trees great performances, Sinclair went to national league twice and hardly scored a goal! He has been linked with clubs due to having a decent agent let’s be honest if Man City were genuinely interested you honestly think he would still be playing for our U23s? People hate on dykes he played Wealdstone scored a hat tick showed his level, Sinclair comes in does ok but doesn’t score in same amount of time but is in some way so much better then dykes?
Comment
-
Originally posted by Rich View Post
Opinions are like back sides, we've all got them. Right now Dykes experience would see him fair better I agree. Give Sinclair half a dozen sub appearances and full games in cups by November/December he's better than Dykes. This isn't a Dykes (or any other striker hate post) it's a "sinclair will be better" post. IMO
5 mins V palace he had a shot blocked and control was miles better
personally Dykes don’t look fit and won’t get 8 goals, I can see Dykes being benched once roberts and willock are fit
Comment
-
Originally posted by shaggy24 View Post
Don’t think it will take 6 games and subs appearances, Dykes has no 1st touch and 2nd touch is a sliding tackle
5 mins V palace he had a shot blocked and control was miles better
personally Dykes don’t look fit and won’t get 8 goals, I can see Dykes being benched once roberts and willock are fit
Comment
-
After seeing him run around in friendlies I see no reason not to have him available.
Our strikers will do better this year if they get service, something we lacked for the majority of last season, but we do lack a genuine presence or threat up top, and the lad has the qualities on paper to be a target man. If we are setting up as a 433 then I can see why he's going to be down the pecking order but I'd say he's as much of a risk as the other 3 options.
Only benefit i see to him not being in the squad is that he has a good loan spot to go to, but he's at an age where he really should be nudging the first team.
Personally would like to see the Villa lad Archer, just because of the Beale link.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Comment