I'm badly struggling with getting my head around what Warburton is trying to achieve. I genuinely can't understand our formation and would not be able to describe it but maybe that's just down to me being an old fogey weaned on 4-4-2.
I believe Warburton has overarching principles based on entertaining, creating scoring opportunities and looking after the ball. That's fair enough but I'm not seeing it on the pitch.
Last night we seemed to have 3 at the back, 1 up front and 6 somewhere in the middle-ish. No surprise that we were therefore wide-open at the back and toothless up front then. But surely we'd boss the middle third with SIX players in there? Didn't happen... first half Forest dominated the game and moved through the thirds with far more pace, energy and intent than us. To me, there was only one winner looking likely and it wasn't us. Absolutely useless approach for a home team playing ordinary opposition in my view.
Miraculously we scored with what felt like our only serious attempt of the half and went in ahead.
2nd half was more even but I put that down more to Forest tiring and not harrying and closing us down so much rather than anything dynamic we were doing. Still threatening nothing meaningful up front, not troubling their keeper and a dreadful lack of supporting runs up to and past Dykes.
The last 5 minutes were shocking. Just needed 2 banks of 4 and see the game out but we had some sort of random spread of players haphazardly dotted about and not tracking their players pushing on. I honestly thought Forest would score a second given how disorganised and all over the place we were in added time.
I could swallow this against Fulham due to their quality but that Forest side is a midtable squad in transition adapting to a new manager. We looked like an away side trying to nick something against them.
I'm afraid this is all starting to look alarmingly like Warburton's first season here. Bright start, goals and points a-plenty and then the wheels came off. Big week coming up.
I believe Warburton has overarching principles based on entertaining, creating scoring opportunities and looking after the ball. That's fair enough but I'm not seeing it on the pitch.
Last night we seemed to have 3 at the back, 1 up front and 6 somewhere in the middle-ish. No surprise that we were therefore wide-open at the back and toothless up front then. But surely we'd boss the middle third with SIX players in there? Didn't happen... first half Forest dominated the game and moved through the thirds with far more pace, energy and intent than us. To me, there was only one winner looking likely and it wasn't us. Absolutely useless approach for a home team playing ordinary opposition in my view.
Miraculously we scored with what felt like our only serious attempt of the half and went in ahead.
2nd half was more even but I put that down more to Forest tiring and not harrying and closing us down so much rather than anything dynamic we were doing. Still threatening nothing meaningful up front, not troubling their keeper and a dreadful lack of supporting runs up to and past Dykes.
The last 5 minutes were shocking. Just needed 2 banks of 4 and see the game out but we had some sort of random spread of players haphazardly dotted about and not tracking their players pushing on. I honestly thought Forest would score a second given how disorganised and all over the place we were in added time.
I could swallow this against Fulham due to their quality but that Forest side is a midtable squad in transition adapting to a new manager. We looked like an away side trying to nick something against them.
I'm afraid this is all starting to look alarmingly like Warburton's first season here. Bright start, goals and points a-plenty and then the wheels came off. Big week coming up.
Comment