If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Good to see the FA take some action against cheats, but still not enough given it helped them to come back and win the game. I know it was against Fulham, but it could happen against QPR too.
Good decision, I thought it was a blatant dive at the time , the Fulham left back was furious,
Yeah, I saw that later in the evening and thought it was cheating of the highest order and is one of the things in football that I hate most. It needs to be eradicated but a 2 match ban is not going to achieve that, it is far too lenient. I would like a 9 match ban like some players have received for pushing refs etc.
The authorities consider a player betting on a football match he has no involvement with or inside knowledge on as a more serious offence than cheating to win a game.
He can't be only diver? Makes me think he only got done cos it was caught from multi-angles by Sky cameras. It's a bit ropey if you only get banned if caught by Live TV cameras, particularly in EFL where 90% of games don't get multi-camera coverage.
Perhaps I'm reading the BBC report wrongly, but it says to me that the ref awarded Coventry a penalty from which they scored, and turned the outcome of the game.
Its OK banning the player after the game having watched numerous camera angles from televised games, but that luxury doesn't come about with most games, and a subsequent ban does not remedy injustices that happen on the pitch at the time of the incident.
More onus needs to be put on the referee and other officials, no matter how hard that might be.
Comment