Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Squad Numbers
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by shaggy24 View Post
Sharing same number as Todd Kane 45 p45
Comment
-
The club seems very well run now and we don't know what goes on behind the scenes so happy to give the management the benefit of the doubt. But generally when you are trying to off-load a product its better not to advertise too loudly that said product is one steaming, smelly turd - which is pretty much the impression we are giving about these two fullbacks (unless we have some deal in the pipelines to off-load them, but if not we could end up having to buy out their contracts which could be expensive - Hammelinen's was four years I believe).
Comment
-
Originally posted by Dono77 View Post
I know kane lost a bit of respect amongst certain people at the club but are we not hanging the guy out to dry? Niko is poor at this level and has shown he's not good enough but kane is. I still think kane is better than kakay but the manager has decided to boot the guy out because he gave an honest answer that he thinks he's better than his direct competitor for a first team place. Yet bright took the club and the manager for a ride yet he was picked every week. Double standards???
We put Nico on a cheap four year deal. Some players will come good under that approach and make us loads of money, but others might no develop as we expected and we have to suffer a small loss. The rewards for this approach is still worth it, surely?
Comment
-
Originally posted by SheepRanger View Post
But wasnt the view that Kane blew hot and cold? I suspect Warbs was well aware of MO's situation at Wed and had that cheaper, more consistent, option in the back of his mind. Kane could be a liability on times and the interview might have been the last straw. Also, his wages are too high for what we can get elsewhere?
We put Nico on a cheap four year deal. Some players will come good under that approach and make us loads of money, but others might no develop as we expected and we have to suffer a small loss. The rewards for this approach is still worth it, surely?
Comment
Comment