Originally posted by QPRDave
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Rumours
Collapse
X
-
Originally posted by davieqpr View Post
Captain of Man City U23s. All round midfielder. Clickbaits say there are about 8 Championship clubs after him. Turned down a loan to Preston last year as he thought he had a chance for main Man City squad but he didn't.
Comment
-
Originally posted by gator View Post
As someone who watches lots of MLS and of course almost every QPR match I can say MLS is overall better than L2, it is a strange league with a mix of NCAA athletes and high price Designated Players who would do well in The Championship, I am not defending MLS because I don't think it is near as good as the Americans think it is but I would definitely rate it higher than L2!
Yes, I think that is likely where Niko will go if not the SPL.
i also agree that Wells and to some extent Hugill might wish that they had stayed at QPR. Hugill has at least got a Championship winners medal for his efforts. Will Norwich keep him or loan him out again?
I am pleased that we have made so many signings earlier than the pre season games (makes a change from recent seasons and is more like the Warnock season).
- Likes 2
Comment
-
I wouldn’t write off Tommy Doyle just because other socalled wonderkids have flopped while on loan. For every usuccessful young loan player there seems to be a decent one. Remember a guy called Taarabt? Or Kyle Walker? Even Sam Field last season was a pleasant surprise.
Matt Smith did not work out, neither did Jan Mlakar. But there are great young loan opportunities out there and I think we should explore it and take advantage of it. The fact the player is from Man City is no concern as I see it. Loan players with little senior experience in a decent League can be a gamble. Matt Smith had only played in Dutch second division before he arrived while Doyle has seven matches for Man City, so he seems a little less risky.
I cannot see why Doyle (20), with seven matches for Man City should be any less inspiring than Jimmy Dunne (23), with 7 matches for Burnley. It looks to me our scouts know what they are doing so if they go for Doyle I support it.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
Originally posted by QPROslo View PostI wouldn’t write off Tommy Doyle just because other socalled wonderkids have flopped while on loan. For every usuccessful young loan player there seems to be a decent one. Remember a guy called Taarabt? Or Kyle Walker? Even Sam Field last season was a pleasant surprise.
Matt Smith did not work out, neither did Jan Mlakar. But there are great young loan opportunities out there and I think we should explore it and take advantage of it. The fact the player is from Man City is no concern as I see it. Loan players with little senior experience in a decent League can be a gamble. Matt Smith had only played in Dutch second division before he arrived while Doyle has seven matches for Man City, so he seems a little less risky.
I cannot see why Doyle (20), with seven matches for Man City should be any less inspiring than Jimmy Dunne (23), with 7 matches for Burnley. It looks to me our scouts know what they are doing so if they go for Doyle I support it.
Comment
Comment